Talk:Great Sea

I'm just wondering as a shaman you should get pretty far by water walking and then go by your epic mount, anyone tried that?

I tried to discover outside of wetlands sea but an invisible wall a la "Super mario 64" came up. I tried with the west of Teldrassil and it was amasing I got extremly far but I later discovered I was disconnected so I probabl ywould have been stuck at an invisivle shield. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Frejh (talk · contr).

Try east of stranglethorn, you will end up in gillijim's isle --Gurluas 20:33, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

what's on the island?   Mr.X8 Talk Contribs 02:00, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Nothing. Well, water. It is the most empty subzone ever.--SWM2448 20:56, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Well, if you want to get technical it's the second-most empty, the first being the Twisting Nether. In-game it's nothing but thin air, so to speak. - Ohten User talk:Ohten

Zandalar

If it is any help, in the game the South Seas shows up. I don't think the Chronicle map is definite as the South Sea is labeled next to Zandalar as well. --Mordecay (talk) 15:15, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Suraf says that in Vol'dun, somewhere near Tortaka Refuge, the area is labeled as Great Sea. Maybe you could check it out to confirm it? --Ryon21 (talk) 15:20, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

I had a hiccup. But the Chronicle map should still be considered unless literally Zandalar and the waters surrounding it is somehow South Sea, which places no border between The Great Sea and the South Sea. What if in reality, South Sea and the Great sea are one. — SurafbrovWarcraft Wiki administrator T / C 15:24, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Blizzistency :D --Ryon21 (talk) 15:26, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Haven't been to Vol'dun yet, and may be a long time till I reach it, but I believe him if he says so :D Then it is both, as I'm just now looking at South Seas south of the Bay of Kings in Zuldazar, basically the south of Zandalar. --Mordecay (talk) 15:29, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Since it is also in-game, maybe put Zandalar and the three zones in the two pages, like it is done for the Darkspear Islands.

Almost forgot https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uQ9CuufHy8I. --Ryon21 (talk) 15:36, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

That's... nice one Blizz. --Mordecay (talk) 15:50, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

There's a Great Sea Catfish School in a river at the Garden of the Loa in Zuldazar. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mordecay (talk · contr).

Sea subzone

I recently removed most navboxes from this article and most other sea articles (Forbidding Sea, North Sea, Veiled Sea) which in return also removed them from the zone's subzone category such as Category:Eastern Plaguelands subzones (for the Forbidding Sea). Should the seas still be included in every zone they're part of or just have it be part of the main continent category like how it is already? e.g. Forbidding Sea is only next to the Eastern Kingdoms so it is in the Category:Eastern Kingdoms category. — SurafbrovWarcraft Wiki administrator T / C 15:01, 29 August 2023 (UTC)

I think the seas should appear in the subzone templates of the zones in which the seas are subzones. PeterWind (talk) 20:16, 29 August 2023 (UTC)

I agree with PeterWind, but I also agree with Suraf that the Seas articles don't need to use every subzone template from every zone they appear in. -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 20:37, 29 August 2023 (UTC)

The sea links weren't removed from the navboxes themselves - just the navboxes are no longer on the articles. I'm asking if we should still include all the categories from the navboxes on these articles manually so they're properly categorized there or should we treat the seas differently in terms of a subzone since they're in a lot of zones. IMO, I'd lean for the latter - it is clear and easier to navigate even for a newbie. But on the other hand, the seas are not in the zone's subzone category which should technically be in it. — SurafbrovWarcraft Wiki administrator T / C 00:54, 30 August 2023 (UTC)