Talk:Voidlord

I'm saving this list.--SWM2448 19:52, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

• Dimensius
• Pandemonius
• Void Baron Galaxis

Chronicle

The Chronicle Void Lords and these are likely not the same. How do we name the Chronicle ones? Or do we move this page? --Mordecay (talk) 09:11, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Void Lord might work if it is a title and consistently capitalized.--SWM2448 19:41, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

And if it's not capitalized? --Mordecay (talk) 14:56, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Unfortunately, it isn't. It is consistently written as "void lords" in Chronicle, which of course gives them the exact same name as the armored voidwalker type. The way I see it, we have three options:
A. Do it like the ogre lord page (where both the WC3 ogre units and the post-TBC "missing link" ogres are listed in the same article).
B. Move this article to "Voidlord" whilst leaving a hatnote pointing to a new "Void lord" page about the entities from Chronicle.
C. Have two pages named "Void lord" but add an arbitrary parenthesis to one of them (like "Void lord (voidwalker type)" or something).
Don't know about anyone else, but option B seems a lot simpler than A or C. Really just wish that Blizzard would check these things before giving two completely different things the exact same name, though (looking at you, storm dragons and storm dragonflight). -- DeludedTroll (talk • contribs) 15:07, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Where is it spelled voidlord?--SWM2448 17:53, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

In  [Jubeka's Journal]. PeterWind (talk) 18:10, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Also, the warlock minion and the associated spell. -- DeludedTroll (talk • contribs) 18:57, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

I'd vote option B as well. ReignTG (talk) 16:11, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

I, too, vote for B. -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 20:35, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

I vote B, too  Cemotucu (talk contribs) 03:22, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Me too --LemonBaby (talk) 08:17, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Yeah I agree with B aswell. PeterWind (talk) 09:07, 23 March 2016 (UTC)