Talk:Race ideas/Archivevote

Votes

Delete

1. Delete — SurafbrovWarcraft Wiki administrator T / C 18:25, 14 March 2018 (UTC) - (Nominated)
2. Delete Alayea (talk / contrib) 18:45, 14 March 2018 (UTC) - (no comment)
3. Delete PcjWowpedia wiki manager (TDrop me a line!•C207,729 contributions and counting) 15:49, 2 April 2018 (UTC) - (no comment)
4. Delete g0urra[T҂C] 14:08, 7 April 2018 (UTC) - (Delete or move to user namespace.)
5. Delete MyMindWontQuiet - (Move or Archive)
6. Delete Dark T Zeratul (talk) 19:39, 13 February 2019 (UTC) - (After further reflection, despite its long history it's still just entirely subjective speculation and theorycrafting. Let the past die. Kill it, if you have to.)

Keep

1. Keep Mrforesttroll (talk) 18:51, 14 March 2018 (UTC) - (It shows options for future playable races as a whole. It's speculation for possible future races as a whole topic in general not something that can exist in individual sections on pages for races. This page existed for a long time. It's not just for races which have character in their game file, but also for those in the files listed as creatures. There is a past version of the page Burning Crusade's race ideas but a modern one can't exist. Also spent some time editing it please don't delete it)
2. Keep Xporc (talk) 19:11, 14 March 2018 (UTC) - (At least a move if not kept, but I'd be sad at seeing a 12-years-old page deleted. Wowpedia should not just be about archiving current lore, but the mindset of people at a certain time as well.)
3. Keep --Ryon21 (talk) 19:20, 14 March 2018 (UTC) - (If we clean up the page and erase things that are not needed (e.g. not having a female model etc.) and we keep it with a more general view rather than a personal, then why not? It does not do any harm, at least for now. If not, then we can move it to Mrforesttrol page.)
4. Keep PeterWind (talk) 21:05, 14 March 2018 (UTC) - (Page could do with a heavy trim for sure, but I don't have anything against the page per se, even if I don't have much of an interest in this topic.)
5. Keep Kirochi 23:38, 9 April 2018 (UTC) - (This page is part of WoWwiki's past glory. Even though airheads plague it with nonsense, we should hate the playa, not the game.)
6. Keep --Ashendant (talk) 22:42, 23 August 2018 (UTC) - (This page as a significant past and has had multiple writters. It shouldn't be shoved into a user article, especially when there are others like it. However it could use a reorganisation.)
7. Keep SWM2448 19:38, 6 April 2019 (UTC) - (At least as an archive...)

Abstain

1. Abstain Sssssssssssssssssssssssss For Pony! (^Sssss/_Slithered) 20:01, 14 March 2018 (UTC) - (Going to withhold my vote for now, just wanted to make sure I'm aware of this.)

1. Abstain Dark T Zeratul (talk) 21:25, 14 March 2018 (UTC) - (I don't feel strongly one way or the other about whether the page should be kept or not, but if it is it definitely needs a substantial trim.)

Comments

I'd rather see this page moved to Mrforesttroll‎'s user namespace than deleted entirely. Xporc (talk) 18:34, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

That could work too. — SurafbrovWarcraft Wiki administrator T / C 18:37, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

If it gets voted to be deleted then move it but I think it should stay here. Mrforesttroll (talk) 18:51, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

I vote the same as Xporc. --Ryon21 (talk) 19:01, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

I think any and all comments about in-game models should be removed, cause it doesn't matter what they currently use or have, Blizzard will make a completely new model for each gender should they become playable. So really all those For or Against are mute. To clarify, I don't mean if a race generally only has 1 gender, I mean if (in-game) only one gender model was created. Sssssssssssssssssssssssss For Pony! (^Sssss/_Slithered) 20:16, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

Bump. — SurafbrovWarcraft Wiki administrator T / C 08:53, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

It's been more than one year, maybe it's time to move on and close down the issue? Xporc (talk) 14:41, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

If we agree on the fact that votes all weigh the same, then it is indeed high time we close the polls and act on the apparent result. Which is to shut down any such debates and treat this page the way it needs to be treated, with strong anti-vandalism policies.--KIROCHI) 14:19, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

Not sure if I want this closed down just yet. Let's come back to this to the end of December 2019. — SurafbrovWarcraft Wiki administrator T / C 11:33, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

You got my go ahead with this @Xporc — SurafbrovWarcraft Wiki administrator T / C 13:01, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

We keepin it then? Xporc (talk) 13:16, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

Yea. — SurafbrovWarcraft Wiki administrator T / C 13:21, 5 February 2020 (UTC)