Talk:Mutated abomination

Name

I might have an issue with this name... I believe they're just referred to as abominations and too close to Fleshbeast. But if this is the name we decide to use, I'll stand by it. Though looking at the model name its actually IcecrownFleshBeast, whereas the original fleshbeast's model name is FleshBeast.... so It's kind of how they did most of the new models... Ghoul, NorthrendGhoul, Worgen, NorthrendWorgen .. among others. So I wouldn't say its a new race, but a new form of abomination (not a new form of fleshbeast). Sssssssssssssssssssssssss For Pony! (^Sssss/_Slithered) 21:45, January 4, 2010 (UTC)

Yes, the full name is IcecrownFleshBeast, and IMO, it can stand as a classification like Flesh titan or Flesh giant.

Loremaster A'noob, Arch Druid of the Noobhoof Clan (^talk/_contribz) 22:04, January 4, 2010 (UTC)

Move

TCG is non-canon, but there is Mutated Abomination in ICC. Should it still be moved to that name? -- Mordecay (talk) 18:33, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

Yeah, why not? They are called "abominations" in several mob names anyway Xporc (talk) 08:04, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

I can't see the card that links to for reference, but on the face of things I'm not really inclined to move it an unofficial name to what sounds like it may just be the name of one creature. -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 23:35, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Festergut Card.jpg and File:Rotface Card.jpg -- Mordecay (talk) 23:40, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

Ah, well, that does change matters. In that case a move may be warranted. -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 00:36, 21 June 2020 (UTC)