Template talk:Language links
Template layout
Just my oppinion but this template is kind of big and fugly... To much information, and kind of an eye sore if put at the front of an article. Might work best at the end of an article though.Baggins 15:09, 19 November 2006 (EST)
- Ugh, even at the end of articles it still looks pretty bad... especially on articles that have little information to go on, when it takes up half the article's page.Baggins 15:21, 19 November 2006 (EST)
- Need to write more info on the languages, then. :P Either that, or make it less obtrusive.
- Some languages there is little to no info for, so no way to add more to them, without going farther into the realm of speculationBaggins 11:08, 20 November 2006 (EST)
- Ugh, even at the end of articles it still looks pretty bad... especially on articles that have little information to go on, when it takes up half the article's page.Baggins 15:21, 19 November 2006 (EST)
- That's a bit better, but is there anyway to maybe reduce the text size down a bit?Baggins 11:45, 20 November 2006 (EST)
- Ah, sorry didn't see the discussion here. Thought I'd touch it up a bit make it a bit easier on the eyes. Reducing the font a bit sounds good, if no one else does I'll tweak it down a bit. --Tusva 11:46, 20 November 2006 (EST)
- Well I don't know how, so you would be best person for hte job right now ;)Baggins 11:48, 20 November 2006 (EST)
- Good job, looks much less obtrusive.Baggins 11:52, 20 November 2006 (EST)
I've made a new version at User:Gourra/Sandbox/5 that uses {{navbox}} and {{navbox with columns}} to make it look pretty. I'll make it the new version if nobody has any objections. --g0urra[T҂C] 10:46, March 5, 2010 (UTC)
Is there a way to get a border between the two neutral lines? The one starting with Arokkoa, and the one starting with High elves. The current, borderless transition between the two look awkward and untidy, but I don't have markup skills to fix it. --Oponyxal / Arodeesa talk contr 17:58, July 30, 2010 (UTC)
Vrykul
Should the Vrykul (language) be added? Not entirely sure, and didn't want to mess with the template since there doesn't seem to be much room for it. -- Mordsith - (talk|contr) 15:48, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
High elves
Even though not playable they are part of the Alliance, shouldn't they be on the Alliance line? 
(Sssss/Slithered) 21:20, September 14, 2010 (UTC)
- I think we're only putting the playable races on there. And there are plenty of neutral high elves, too; they don't really have a nation or any leadership anymore that can affiliate them all with one faction or another. -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 21:25, September 14, 2010 (UTC)
Making up languages
Please don't force me to lock the template... I really don't want to. If you have a source make the page first before adding it to the template. (Sssss/Slithered) 22:57, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
RPG languages
Shouldn't we remove languages exclusive to the RPG? (Ignan, Aquan, Terran, Auran, Gnoll, Titan and Nerglish.) (Luxor(t/c) 10:50, 19 February 2012 (UTC))
- Agreed. --Oponyxal (talk) 19:58, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
A request
Would it be possible to add the nathrezim and tol'vir languages to the template? I would do it myself, but I don't want to accidentally break the template. -- 
DeludedTroll (talk • contribs) 08:22, 31 October 2015 (UTC)