Talk:Waygate (location)

Chamber of the Aspects

Should be cited the raid portals on the Chamber of the Aspects, as well the inside Obsidian Sanctum are also waygates —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Pudim17 (talk · contr).

Too many waygates

We now have Waygate (the subzone), Way Gate (Warcraft III), Titan waygate (for titan ones), and Ogre Waygate (for the teleport system). Are all of these needed?--SWM2448 23:33, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

I may be mistaken in how things were divided before, but I think it was fine. Waygate the subzone as its own page, then all other waygates titan and ogre included on a single page. Having a single generic waygate page with sections for titan and other is fine, but IMO they don't need separate pages. --Aquamonkeyeg (talk) 23:48, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

"Titan waygate" is new. The general concept (now nowhere) was on the Warcraft III page.--SWM2448 23:50, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

Condensed them all into one page, Waygates, we could delete the others. -- MyMindWontQuiet (talk) 00:16, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

That was the opposite of a discussion. You have gone from too much tweaking to too much total revamps. Dial it back please.--SWM2448 01:04, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

What are you even talking about ? No article was changed.

I just made a new one called Waygates for a preview of the "single generic waygate page with sections for titan and other" that Aquamonkey talked about. We can either keep it that way and delete the others, or whatever, no decision was made yet. -- MyMindWontQuiet (talk) 01:08, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Okay.--SWM2448 01:09, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

So what do you think, one generic waygate article with a section per type of waygate, or 3 different articles? -- MyMindWontQuiet (talk) 01:11, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

I cleaned up and redirected the pages. Way Gate redirects to the WC3 section of Waygates. The header on Waygate points to Waygates instead of Titan waygate (which is now obsolete). I think this effectively just moved the old Way Gate page to Waygates which seems appropriate in concept, though I suppose a proper "move" would be preferable. --Aquamonkeyeg (talk) 01:18, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Just you guys know, I'll probably create a Way Gate (Warcraft III) page to match with the other RTS sections, like we have a Dark Portal (Warcraft II) section for example. Xporc (talk) 08:22, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

There. Did some cleaning up, redirected the Titan waygate and Titan waygates page to Waygate#Titan waygates, and created a RTS page the Warcraft III buidling.

So in total we have: Waygates (in general), Way Gate (Warcraft III)‎‎ (RTS unit), Waygate and Masters' Gate‎‎ (the subzones) and Ogre Waygate (the teleport system). Don't think it'd be worthy to merge those any more because each of them represent a specific thing.12:48, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Do we need Ogre Waygate ?

How about this? EDIT:to clarify, I redirected Ogre Waygate to Waygate#Ogre waygates but kept the "Talador object"-like categories in the Ogre Waygate page. Xporc (talk) 15:09, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Seems fine to me -- MyMindWontQuiet (talk) 15:51, 28 February 2017 (UTC)