Talk:Timolain the Accursed
Crusader Enchant
There's no evidence that Timolain created the Crusader enchant or even was an enchanter. I don't know where people are coming up with this idea. Neither of the comments from Alexia Ironknife or Bardu Sharpeye mention enchanting. Cite your sources or state your case, otherwise it doesn't belong here. --Tyrsenus t c 03:50, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
Name
From where does his name come? The RPG? Xavius, the Satyr Lord 18:14, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
- OK, if I've got it right, there is nothing to support Timolain being that Crusade mage except for a seemingly unrealted phylactery showing up for a short time by mistake? Kinda far-fetched. Xavius, the Satyr Lord 10:48, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
Merge
I suggest this is merged into the Timolain Phylactery article. Most of this is pure speculation that could be easily mentioned at the bottom of the said article. Since Timolaine's existence or any knowledge of him is nil, it really doesn't need its own page.Baggins (talk) 07:34, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
- Agreed. His connection to Ashbringer is only speculation, but garnered much support when Ashbringer theories were running wild on the official forums some years ago. IMO, this should be noted on the phylactery article, but not presented as fact. --Tyrsenus t c 17:54, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
- Indeed. Epic thread it was. --Tyrsenus t c 15:59, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
- So, a year and a half later, is this getting merged or not? -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 23:04, January 28, 2010 (UTC)
- I support the merge. This article seems to be just speculation about the item. Benitoperezgaldos (talk) 00:41, January 29, 2010 (UTC)
- So, a year and a half later, is this getting merged or not? -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 23:04, January 28, 2010 (UTC)
- Indeed. Epic thread it was. --Tyrsenus t c 15:59, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
Comics
- Did that Ashbringer comic came out yet? It would put an end and strech a beggining for ALOT of theories, this probably being one of them. Amirw (talk) 16:22, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
Deletion?
With the revelation in the comic that Magni Bronzebeard forged the Ashbringer, Timolain is now nothing more than a name attached to a long-since-removed item. Any reason to keep this page anymore? -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 06:32, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
Can't see much reason to no...Wait MAGNI created the Ashbringer? please violate some rule to get me a copy of that comic, thank you. :( Amirw (talk) 13:56, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
- Actually, on second thought, merging it with
[Timolain's Phylactery] seems like a much better idea than simply deleting it. Anyone else agree? -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 07:56, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
- Yap, both the nostalgia value and any other info recorded here could be safeguarded in that way while still clearing up the wiki a bit. Amirw (talk) 08:44, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
Merging seems like a good idea, at least until a real existing Timolain is confirmed in some way.Baggins (talk) 09:35, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
- I agree. I would also like to know what kind of weird reasoning turned a random name on an extremely random object into that one Scarlet Crusade mage.
Xavius, the Satyr Lord 10:35, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
Timolain Mograine?
If he would have crafted Ashbringer he would be Highlord Mograines son? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bosteir7477 (talk · contr).
Sources
What seems wrong / unsourced? --Mordecay (talk) 23:59, 18 December 2018 (UTC)