Talk:Stonespire tribe

From Warcraft Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Gann consider's them or Considered a lost tribe

The Stonespire are "considered a lost tribe" with the source from Gann's quest is accurate as everything in game supports Gann's statement. Gann "considers them a lost tribe", which Ryon keeps inserting implies Gann is lying when we only do such edits when the NPCs are put into question by other things in the game. Nothing puts Gann's words into question and Ryon's edit is unnecessary. Gann Stonespire (talk) 20:09, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

I'm sorry I'm not sure I see the problem here. Gann calls them a "lost tribe" and as such, Gann's opinion on the matter is mentioned here. Is there any significance to the term "lost tribe"? Is this anything other than what Gann call's the state of his tribe? Is it used anywhere else? PeterWind (talk) 21:48, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
As a minor part of lore, the main source of info on them is Gann and all other info says they were killed and exiled as well. There's no reason for Gann's words to be put into question when everything supports his testimony. Gann Stonespire (talk) 21:59, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
How do you figure the opinion is being questioned? Attributing a quote to a character is perfectly natural. PeterWind (talk) 23:09, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
Attributing it like this, makes more sense
  • the tribe is considered lost [1]
or
  • with Gann, a survivor of the tribe, calling them a lost tribe.[1]
 
  1. ^ a b H [26] Revenge of Gann
  2. Gann Stonespire (talk) 23:12, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
    I think the way it is now works just fine. PeterWind (talk) 23:27, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
    Not really, its too long and implies the tribe being lost is in dispute, when it isn't. Gann Stonespire (talk) 23:45, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
    There is nothing inaccurate about saying "Gann Stonespire calls them a lost tribe." -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 20:28, 6 August 2019 (UTC)