Talk:Patch 2.3.3
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Lol, are you sure that Slouken didn't just make a typo and intend to put 2.3.2 for this change? Kidburla 12:42, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, it's possible. Even if 2.3.3 did exist, it's quite likely it will have been rolled into 2.3.2 by now. We'll have to wait and see. Kirkburn talk contr 15:55, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Okay, so do we know if this patch is going ahead? Certainly the main page says that the "next patch" is 2.4.0 and that is currently in development. I wonder if anyone can verify that the single change mentioned in the article WAS put into 2.3.2? If so, we should really delete this page. If not, we should update the "next" box on the Main Page to reflect that the next patch is 2.3.3. Kidburla 02:46, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
- Well if the bug is alive then I think we can safely assume that 2.3.3 does exist. Therefore, the Main Page should be updated so it now says "current 2.3.2 next 2.3.3" (obviously can't do this myself as not an admin!). I just think that at the moment, it is inconsistent, because on the page for 2.3.2, it says "next 2.3.3" but on the Main Page it says "next 2.4.0" so we should make them the same, whichever one we choose. Incidentally, I notice the development version at WoWWiki:Main_Page_Dev has been updated - great, but we need to sync the Main Page now. (By the way, Coobra you are hilarious). Kidburla 15:55, 16 January 2008 (UTC)