Talk:Bloodtotem tribe
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
With survivors of the original tribe, should this be split? --Mordecay (talk) 22:23, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
- Don't think it's really necessary, not until we know more at least. Xporc (talk) 22:27, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
- It really should be moved back to the original name of the tribe honestly. They were only known as the feltotem for a very short time in their long history.
(Sssss/Slithered) 00:42, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
- Yeah, I felt moving it from Bloodtotem to Feltotem in the first place was premature. -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 00:48, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
- With the legion epilogue, we know more about survivors of the Bloodtotem tribe and the division of the tribe. SargerasDoomhammer (talk) 23:58, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
- I feel there's something to do here with the Fel tauren page. Xporc (talk) 08:18, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
- I think we should keep the Fel Tauren page as is and the revert Feltotem page to the Bloodtotem page while making a section in the article called Feltotem. That way there's a clear point of reference of when the Bloodtotem were going by Feltotem and when the dissidents emerged and reclaimed the name Bloodtotem.--X59 (talk) 17:46, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
- Maybe merge the Fel tauren, Felborne and other minor fel races into the Felsworn page? About the splitting, I'm with X59, that is basically do the same as the Felskorn. --Ryon21 (talk) 17:58, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
- Consolidating them into the Felsworn page is a bad idea from an encyclopedic standpoint; they're separate things and should have separate pages. X59 has the right idea, I think. -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 20:17, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
- In what way they are separate things? Aren't the two using fel energies and are part of the Legion? I mean, yeah, they are two different races but they are embodied in fel, isn't that the definiton of a Felsworn? We can also add them in their respective race pages as a section. --Ryon21 (talk) 21:01, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
- Consolidating them into the Felsworn page is a bad idea from an encyclopedic standpoint; they're separate things and should have separate pages. X59 has the right idea, I think. -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 20:17, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
- I feel there's something to do here with the Fel tauren page. Xporc (talk) 08:18, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
- With the legion epilogue, we know more about survivors of the Bloodtotem tribe and the division of the tribe. SargerasDoomhammer (talk) 23:58, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
- Yeah, I felt moving it from Bloodtotem to Feltotem in the first place was premature. -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 00:48, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
- It really should be moved back to the original name of the tribe honestly. They were only known as the feltotem for a very short time in their long history.
Rather than a split, I suggest we do the same thing as the Tideskorn page: Have a single Bloodtotem tribe page, with something akin to "The Bloodtotem tribe is a tribe of Highmountain tauren. Those among the Bloodtotem who accepted the fel gift and became Felsworn are known as Feltotem, while others remained Bloodtotem." Xporc (talk) 14:39, 16 April 2018 (UTC)