Talk:Ironforge dwarf

Name

Why is the page named Ironforge Dwarves and not Bronzebeard dwarves? BobNamataki (talk · contr) 23:17, November 6, 2009 (UTC)

Probably cause most people know them as the dwarves of ironforge. Sssssssssssssssssssssssss For Pony! (^Sssss/_Slithered) 23:36, November 6, 2009 (UTC)

I say: In what I know, not all dwarves of Ironforge are Bronzebeard despite the fact the clan rules the city. This will completely change in Cataclysm and that will be sure. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Gabrirt (talk · contr).

Should this page be merged like the Wildhammer dwarf page

If Wildhammer dwarf redirects to Wildhammer clan, and if Gilnean redirects to Gilneas (kingdom), should this page be redirected and merged with Ironforge (kingdom)? As this page only exists separately based on the RPG information. Also Polar furbolg seems to have been recently merged. Mrforesttroll (talk) 11:13, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

Polar furbolg was a 1-line long page about furbolgs being white in snow environment, that's not really the same thing Xporc (talk) 16:27, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

Yes but it's the same as Wildhammer dwarf, as it's currently inconsistent as to what exists as a page between Wildhammer dwarf and Ironforge dwarf. Mrforesttroll (talk) 06:17, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

I don't think I've ever seen a Wildhammer dwarf that specifically left the Wildhammer clan, whereas i saw plenty of Ironforge dwarves working against Ironforge's interests. Technically I wouldn't mind if a Wildhammer dwarf page was reinstated but it'd be fairly redundant Xporc (talk) 08:09, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

I believe that this page should be merged with Bronzebeard Clan as the information there is essentially the one offered on this page but more detailed. Not to mention, the Bronzebeard page makes it clear they are affiliated with Ironforge, so it'll essentially keep the same connection to if we were to merge it with the Ironforge Kingdom. Tbond15 (talk) 20:30, 7 March 2019 (UTC)