Talk:Illidan's Naga

Is it actually supposed to be spelled "Illidan's Naga" and not "Illidan's naga"? Rolandius (talk - contr) 06:48, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Yes.--SWM2448 17:09, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Cleanup

It's similar to the case when Gabirt tried to make Dreadlord Insurgents (the Scarlet Crusade, the Undercity rebellion and the Risen being a part of it) a WoW thing despite there's no a single mention of that group in WoW. This applies to Illidan's Naga as well, it's a Warcraft III. --Mordecay (talk) 22:36, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Illidan's Naga is a generic name, though. Even though they are not mentioned by name in WoW, I don't see why we shouldn't use it as an umbrella term for all Outland naga. Xporc (talk) 23:04, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Agreed. Not that it doesn't still need some cleanup, though. -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 23:15, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Hmm... it's not since naga is capitalized and it refers to the group from W3, no? And using it as an umbrella term wouldn't be the same thing as saying that the Risen, Forsaken rebels and the Scarlet Crusaders are branches of the Dreadlord Insurgents? --Mordecay (talk) 23:17, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

So basically you're bothered because they are called "Illidan's Naga" instead of "Illidan's naga"? The thing is that the Risen, Forsaken and Scarlet Crusades were all groups created after the Dreadlord Insurgents were destroyed, so it was out of line to classify them as members just because they happened to share some nathrezim commanders. AFAIK the "Illidan's Naga" faction was never destroyed, and the way I understand it the naga tribes probably all existed before coming to Outland, Blizzard just gave them a generic name for WC3. Xporc (talk) 10:14, 5 January 2018 (UTC)