Talk:Eye of Kilrogg (warlock ability)
Attack?
I noticed tonight that the Eye can attack mobs, and does a fair amount of damage. I tried to use it in a duel but it said my opponent was an invalid target. Anyone know exactly what it can and can't attack? --Tcgiant 06:30, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
Stealthy description?
The article states that it is no longer stealthy and the description of the eye itself has changed to match. I'm guessing the spell description changed as well. Can anyone put up the new description, or indicate here whether or not that description changed? --Scandal 12:22, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
Tips conflict
The tips say that a Warlock can pull with the eye from a great distance. A later tip ( currently the last ) says that the eye will not aggro mobs (which would seem to make pulling impossible). Dga 21:18, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
Fixed Alchemistmerlin 18:48, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Patchwerk
There is a report on a blog on TankSpot.com:
http://www.tankspot.com/forums/blogs/sylvaneart/2473-how-do-you-fail-naxx-25-after-farm.html
That Patchwerk can be agroed using the Eye.
Health
The article says that it only has 1 point of health; however, I pretty sure on my 48 warlock it had around 1k health (about half of mine) and was even able to take about 3 or 4 hits from the elites in Sunken Temple. I am unable to get on WoW right now but when I will I'll get the exact numbers, also if any one would be the hp of you and eye at other levels I would be to see if it's a % of yours Kantoisamo (talk) 15:23, February 13, 2010 (UTC)
Race
What exactly is this? Is it meant to be a lesser version of a beholder? 
The Artist Formerly Known As, MoneygruberTheGoblin (talk contribs) 06:22, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
- I think it is some kind of magical construct (that predates beholders).--SWM2448 06:32, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
- In the W2 manual the Eye of Kil'rogg was CREATED by the Ogre-Magi's death magicks and were described as free-floating apparitions in the manual, which are synonymous with ghosts and funnily, the Eye of the Legion battle pet is classified as undead but has been called demonic eye sentries. They are definitely constructs and I wonder if Observers are too, there was one Observer like being in Auchidoun that was called a construct as I recall.VisionOfPerfection (talk) 02:26, 25 November 2014 (UTC)VisionofPerfection
Possession
Eyes of Kilrogg are not sentient. They are not beings. They are not ghosts. They are literally nothing more than magical constructs used by spellcasters to see through, and cannot possess other creatures. Stop adding this nonsense into the article unless you can point to a source that directly says otherwise, and not a belabored and entirely inaccurate extrapolation claiming that anything that's non-corporeal is capable of possessing other creatures. -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 23:58, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
- It doesn't matter if the Eyes of Kilrogg are sentient or not. Fel uses souls as energy and they are constructed with fel (which warlocks convert life into). In addition, they are apparitions/illusions linked to the warlocks' conscious (which the soul contains). The only one posting nonsense is you, as usual. If the Eyes of Kilrogg are not undead ghosts, how is the Eye of Kilrogg spell a necromantic spell if it doesn't even involve the dead (or undead)? Would you like explaining that?
- They are constructed with necromantic energy and do not have corporeal bodies despite being "attackable". What you're championing is the notion that necromantic energy doesn't inherently raise corpses when corpses are saturated with it. That's all I'm seeing from youVisionOfPerfection (talk) 00:36, 10 November 2015 (UTC)VisionOfPerfection