Talk:Dark Below

Shouldn't this article be deleted as it contains Aprendix Three-only information? Benitoperezgaldos (talk) 20:00, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

They weren't deleted, they were moved into one location. This is a large article unlike the others, so it should remain. Sssssssssssssssssssssssss For Pony! (^Sssss/_Slithered) 20:50, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

Actually the article is large just for the speculation (which is in Retcon 1 already) and the term is used only once in the Aprenix Three, so I'll clean up this article. Benitoperezgaldos (talk) 20:15, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

So, should the page be redirected or deleted? The only mention an offhand one from Manual of Monsters: Appendix Three, where it says "Demons, devils, and other infernal creatures most certainly take an active interest in the workings of Azeroth. Sorcerers often claim that their power comes directly from such dark sources and occasionally have a patron beast of the Dark Below to foster their magic."--SWM2448 23:31, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

"Fake" expansion

We should leave a comment about this "incident" for people looking for it ;-) --LemonBaby (talk) 21:02, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Probably not a bad idea for now. We can remove it after Blizzcon. -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 21:18, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Location category

Considering there's Ozumat referencing it, should the category stay as RPG location or be changed Lore location? --Mordecay (talk) 21:00, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

The RPG and Ozumat Dark Belows are not the same thing, so the RPG location tag can stay IMO Xporc (talk) 21:08, 8 October 2017 (UTC)