Forum:Where is patch 3.9?
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Where is patch 3.9 in the chain. Patch 3.3.5a points to 4.0 instead of 3.9.0. And patch 4.0 points back to 3.3.5a instead of 3.9.0. Why is that?
--Hans Kamp (talk) 14:01, July 1, 2010 (UTC)
- No details on it yet besides some passing mentions from some blues. --Pcj (T •C ) 14:03, July 1, 2010 (UTC)
- Is there even going to be a patch 3.9? The only source for that number was a conjecture based on the official site, which listed the Gnomeregan/Echo Isles event as "3p9". However, the files for that event are in 3.3.5 already, it just isn't activated on the servers yet. - Sikon (talk) 14:30, July 1, 2010 (UTC)
- It was also mentioned at http://forums.worldofwarcraft.com/thread.html?topicId=25626575587&sid=1 --Pcj (T •C ) 14:32, July 1, 2010 (UTC)
- Hmm, didn't see that one. Now that 3.9.0 has been confirmed by Blizzard, I think it makes sense to insert it between 3.3.5a and 4.0.0. - Sikon (talk) 14:47, July 1, 2010 (UTC)
- It was also mentioned at http://forums.worldofwarcraft.com/thread.html?topicId=25626575587&sid=1 --Pcj (T •C ) 14:32, July 1, 2010 (UTC)
- Is there even going to be a patch 3.9? The only source for that number was a conjecture based on the official site, which listed the Gnomeregan/Echo Isles event as "3p9". However, the files for that event are in 3.3.5 already, it just isn't activated on the servers yet. - Sikon (talk) 14:30, July 1, 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah, that is fairly solid confirmation. Even if it doesn't turn out to occur, we can just get rid of the page again (or archive it as a record of the confusion). Kirkburn talk contr 10:01, July 2, 2010 (UTC)
- We also don't have any details on what would be in that patch. It seems a little premature to put up a patch page with no notes on it besides "this patch will exist." -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 16:28, July 2, 2010 (UTC)
- It is strongly implied it could coincide with the release of the gnome and troll events, so that's something? Kirkburn talk contr 18:03, July 2, 2010 (UTC)
- No, they've already explicitly stated otherwise on that note, which was why the 3.9 page was deleted in the first place. -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 18:04, July 2, 2010 (UTC)
- It is strongly implied it could coincide with the release of the gnome and troll events, so that's something? Kirkburn talk contr 18:03, July 2, 2010 (UTC)
- We also don't have any details on what would be in that patch. It seems a little premature to put up a patch page with no notes on it besides "this patch will exist." -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 16:28, July 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah, that is fairly solid confirmation. Even if it doesn't turn out to occur, we can just get rid of the page again (or archive it as a record of the confusion). Kirkburn talk contr 10:01, July 2, 2010 (UTC)