User talk:Wige63114
|
This is the talk page for User:Wige
|
Re:Category:Faction_achievements_that_might_need_renamed
These admins have gotten me all confused. I believe you are correct and this category is actually backward. Because it's a proper noun, disambigs for factions should be capitalized. But otherwise (like name collisions for titles, talents, achievements, etc) should not be.
See this talk page. I remember after asking that question, I was really frustrated so just stopped making edits for a little while. -Howbizr (talk) 18:57, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
- I won't be offended if it gets deleted. I'd rather you just repurpose it to capture the "(horde)" and "(alliance)" achievements I already fixed. (I'd be shocked if there aren't some like that). I'm really not sure how to search for those effectively, without just paging through all the achievement articles. -Howbizr (talk) 19:28, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Phasing
I like your addition to the Phasing article. I'm thinking, though, that it might be better to have it in the "Appearance" section in some fashion. The flavors you mention leave out "NPC phasing" (ala The Spirit of Gnomeregan). Justly, of course - you're talking about phasing that affects players ability to interact with each other. But I'd be more happy with the article if it didn't describe phasing effects in separate (and separated) sections. --Eirik Ratcatcher (talk) 20:34, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
- Ah, the grey area about phasing... the Bash'ir device I mentioned elsewhere specifically uses the word, but uses what appear to be different mechanics. As for "Appearance", perhaps "varieties" might be a substitute? --Eirik Ratcatcher (talk) 18:51, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
moving
When you move an article due to it being misspelled please remember to to fix the articles they were linked on to the new correct spelling, before marking the redirect for deletion. Otherwise redirects are good. To check which article links, see The what-links-here link! TherasTaneel (talk) 21:22, 30 August 2009 (UTC)