Talk:Zul'Aman (Classic)

From Warcraft Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Past discussions archived to...
  • ...Talk:Zul'Aman (Classic)/Archive01 Archived December 2005 - August 2008

Split

This article should probably be split into a lore and an instance page. And a new page for the level 85 version. -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 23:50, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

I'm not exactly sure why we need a new one... they're only retuning this one, not really changing anything... Seems like the only thing we'd be changing is the stats, gear, and maybe the strategies. Snake.gifSssssssssssssssssssssssss Coobra sig3.gifFor Pony! (Sssss/Slithered) 06:10, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
What? They are not changing it? I just lost my reason to live. No really, I was really looking forward to see what would happen with Zul'Aman, and... nothing happened? Neutralion (talk) 06:18, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Nope, apparently they're just trying to open up more heroic content at level 85, since it's a bit empty atm. Maybe one day when the content is considered old enough it will receive new lore... though unlikely. ZG got an update, and we all knew it was coming, because of how the quest lines in STV ended. Snake.gifSssssssssssssssssssssssss Coobra sig3.gifFor Pony! (Sssss/Slithered) 06:20, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Hey, new articles were made for Onyxia and Naxxramas even though nothing really changed. -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 06:45, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Hmm... true. Snake.gifSssssssssssssssssssssssss Coobra sig3.gifFor Pony! (Sssss/Slithered) 06:49, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
And by the way, I thought we are keeping old articles for "historical purposes" and making new. Neutralion (talk) 06:55, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
We should also have a separate page for the lore and history of the region, like Zul'Gurub. -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 18:33, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Onyxia and Naxxramas were completely changed with 10- and 25-man modes. Blizzard says that Zul'Aman will have a 5-man level 85 heroic mode, but the question is what happens with the raid instance? We won't know until it opens up for testing. --g0urra[T҂C] 18:49, 2 March 2011 (UTC)