Talk:Silverpine Forest
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Notable quests
We changed it to "Notable quests" because the section no longer discusses all the quests in the zone, similar to the NPC section. I changed it back here simply because I have already started changing many zone pages to "Notable quests" - however, if you would like we can discuss it here. --Jiyambi t || c 17:15, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
- If you plan to mention some quests and/or quest chains i think it's a good idea, otherwise, it doesn't work. --Phoenics 17:41, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
- Nah no quests should be listed on a zone page at all. If there is to be a noteable quest article it should be its own article, seperate from the main zone quest section. Imo, the title for the section should in each zone page should be "Quests".Baggins 17:43, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
- I agree! That's way a removed the quests from most of the articles and made separate pages. And as a name Quests sounds better. --Phoenics 17:55, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
- I hadn't planned on listing them. As I said in my first comment, I had been changing the quest section to resemble the NPC section, where in a brief summary paragraph it mentions a few key quests/chains and a "main" link to the actual quest list. Is this not a suitable way to set up the article? just adding the link without summary seems incomplete, but if that is how people want it then so be it. And if there is a summary, and it looks very similar to the "Notable Characters" section, it seems it should be called "Notable Quests". Though, I suppose I am making a bigger deal of this than necessary. I would ask on IRC, but my client broke itself and I have yet to re-install it. --Jiyambi t || c 20:54, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
- It seems normal to add a few details, but still just because one name works for NPC section doesn't mean it works for the Quest section as well. Maybe an alternative could be found to Notable Quests? --Phoenics 06:29, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
- Actually I realized I was being kinda silly. Sorry about that. "Quests" is fine, most the articles are named that anyways, its better not to change it if unnecessary. I will fix the 2-3 articles I changed when I notice them. And again, thanks for all the help with this project :) --Jiyambi t || c 15:07, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
- It seems normal to add a few details, but still just because one name works for NPC section doesn't mean it works for the Quest section as well. Maybe an alternative could be found to Notable Quests? --Phoenics 06:29, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
- I hadn't planned on listing them. As I said in my first comment, I had been changing the quest section to resemble the NPC section, where in a brief summary paragraph it mentions a few key quests/chains and a "main" link to the actual quest list. Is this not a suitable way to set up the article? just adding the link without summary seems incomplete, but if that is how people want it then so be it. And if there is a summary, and it looks very similar to the "Notable Characters" section, it seems it should be called "Notable Quests". Though, I suppose I am making a bigger deal of this than necessary. I would ask on IRC, but my client broke itself and I have yet to re-install it. --Jiyambi t || c 20:54, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
- I agree! That's way a removed the quests from most of the articles and made separate pages. And as a name Quests sounds better. --Phoenics 17:55, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
- Nah no quests should be listed on a zone page at all. If there is to be a noteable quest article it should be its own article, seperate from the main zone quest section. Imo, the title for the section should in each zone page should be "Quests".Baggins 17:43, 19 August 2007 (UTC)