Talk:Pet Battle System
Should we make a Pet Template, like the Mount Template using the types given in the beta?--Ashbear160 (talk) 19:13, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
| ||||||||
Here's a example--Ashbear160 (talk) 19:21, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
- We already have one {{companions}}. This one should likely be updated (when we get more info) to the new system.
(Sssss/Slithered) 19:23, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
- Woah that thing is a mess, thanks blizzard for giving us pet types.--Ashbear160 (talk) 19:26, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
- considering the parameters blizzard gave us before it's good, but the new types makes it look awfully inadequate
- They are probably flying pets :D.--Ashbear160 (talk) 19:31, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
Three lists
We now have three different lists of companion pets: Pet Battle System#Wild_pets, Pet Journal pets and Companion#List by source. Any chance of merging them into one page?--LemonBaby (talk) 15:40, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
- Yeah someone has gone overboard with the lists... Well i propose this:
- Leave the second list as it is since it's a list of lore entries much like we have a list of dungeon lore entries.
- So that we do not overload any specific page we make a article list for each pet type, much like we have for mount types.(there are just too many pets to contain in one page now).--Ashbear160 (talk) 16:17, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
- I don't have time in the next two days (exam you see), but i will gladly help after that.--Ashbear160 (talk) 16:18, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
- Also the "Wild pets lists" list a lot of pets that are not wild pets...--Ashbear160 (talk) 16:20, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
- Huh okay that's a lot of lists... Don't know if we should just delete this last one after we add the appropriate tags...
- Anyway if anyone wants to start here is the article name Aquatic companions(using the same category name) and here's the template with a small list(probably imcomplete) of aquatic pets.
- --Ashbear160 (talk) 16:40, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
- I think we should merge the lore phrase of Pet Journal pets and the sources of Companion#List by source into the table of Pet Battle System#Wild pets.
- Companions by expansion should be deleted imo
Loremaster A'noob, Arch Druid of the Noobhoof Clan (talk/contribz) 17:43, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
- I don't think that table should be there... it occupies more than half of the article and a lot of them aren't wild pets either.
- Pet journal pets is a list of lore entries like the dungeon journal lore articles, so they should be kept separate.
- Companions by expansion should be added to each individual list
- Companions by source should be fused with the lists.
- The template was already prepared to be like the mount template so there isn't any problems with that.I'll start the Aquatic companions article anyway--Ashbear160 (talk) 18:13, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
- So here is the incomplete example because i currently have to study for a exam.--Ashbear160 (talk) 18:36, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
- If anybody disagrees with the current example i gave tell me. The list on this page is just too big occupying roughly 70% of the article for a system explanation article and is not list article.--Ashbear160 (talk) 18:50, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
Could we also get a page listing non-capture pets by quality? There's a list in this blue post Draztal made in July, but that list is out of date, and doesn't include any of the new pets added in Mists. I know that the 
[Hopling], 
[Feral Vermling] and 
[Terrible Turnip] are all rare quality, and I'm guessing that most or all of the other MoP achievement pets are as well. -- Gordon Ecker (talk) 10:10, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
- I'm going to add a quality column to the existing lists. -- Gordon Ecker (talk) 01:36, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
- Okay, I added the columns, but most of the qualities still need confirmation. -- Gordon Ecker (talk) 05:08, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
Cost lowered by rep?
While going to learn to battle pets. I noticed that it shown a gold amount lower then 100. I think it was about 95. Not sure if it was the rep. Anyone else noticed this? The Alchemic Warrior of Travels (talk) 01:37, 1 October 2012 (UTC)