Talk:Husk of Sor'getha

In-game

Did this actually make it to the full game? Llamaman202 (talk) 11:40, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

I guess this isn't in-game, nope? any idea of what quests went around this place?--Lon-ami (talk) 14:29, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

I believe it was taken out before players were able to legitimately enter Twilight Highlands. -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 21:12, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

So since it did not make it out of Alpha, should we have an article? (DNP or something?)

Loremaster A'noob, Arch Druid of the Noobhoof Clan (^talk/_contribz) 19:07, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

It was in the beta, but as far as I know you could not legitimately enter Twilight Highlands before it was removed. It's very much like the pictures of Archimonde's skeleton in front of the World Tree in that sense. So if someone can confirm that it was indeed removed before Twilight Highlands was opened, then yes, it should be deleted for consistency's sake. Otherwise, the picture of Archimonde's skeleton should also be restored and marked with a removedfromgame tag. -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 20:36, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

I'm not saying it should, but it can not be "restored" even if it was allowed. Anything that was deleted on WoWWiki before the fork does not exist in Wowpedia's logs (I just checked its old file name again, just in case), and anyone who cares on Wowpedia no longer has the user rights to get the file from WoWWiki's logs. It would have to be re-upladed from an external source, which likely exist en masse.--SWM2448 20:58, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Well the skull can still be found by using the google search function: BAM! - Aedror (talk) 21:15, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

The skeleton of Archimonde appeared in some official videos of TBC, the ones about Caverns of Time, so it should be in the wiki. Someone could ask over WoWWiki for them to restore the file so they have it too and then recover it.

As for this page, I don't think it does any harm to have this here. I think it appeared on the alpha map, that appeared visible without needing to go to the zone. Of course, it should be removed from the template of the existing subzones and categorized under removed from beta, but that's all.--Lon-ami (talk) 09:36, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

I don't personally care one way or the other, I'd just like some consistency. -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 18:31, 25 January 2011 (UTC)