Talk:Demoniac
I really don't think there's a need to go into such details about a minor occupation mentioned once in a cut vanilla quest. I mean humans in the Twilight's Hammer can be shaman, in the Scourge they can be necromancers, but you don't see me going to these pages and adding "blablabla despite the existance of human necromancers, playable humans can't be necromancers" Xporc (talk) 09:36, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
- Yea, I'd have to agree with Xporc on this. — Surafbrov T / C 09:38, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
- Is the goal to have similar pages on all the groups listed on Zandalar Tribe set? PeterWind (talk) 13:30, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
"and taught them the ways of the demoniacs"
The quest text specifically says that fulfilling it shows your "willingness" to become a demoniac. But there exists no followup quest on this matter. It seems incorrect to me to say that the adventurer was taught, when they never are. Perhaps, "Recently, the Zandalari gave powerful demoniac clothing to warlock adventurers who were willing to learn the ways of the demoniac."? Considering it is a feat few master. Azarchius (talk) 23:10, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
- What about the current text? Xporc (talk) 23:16, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
- Looks great! Azarchius (talk) 23:28, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Za'roco the Grifter
How come he's in "See also"? He does not appear to have any connection to Zandalari demoniacs. Azarchius (talk) 23:10, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
- Because he's the only known Zandalari warlock AFAIK Xporc (talk) 23:16, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
- We only assume that he is a Warlock base on his abilities so he isn't really confirmed to be a Warlock. — Surafbrov T / C 23:24, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
- I believe his presence in the article is due to the mass editing, which started with a note about the playability of Zandalari warlocks. This NPC is a testament to the existence of Zandalari warlocks (edit: and perhaps not even), but has no relevancy to demoniacs, which seem to me as removed from warlocks as demon hunters. Azarchius (talk) 23:28, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
- Yeah he is a warlock, but not a demoniac. -- MyMindWontQuiet 07:45, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
- I believe his presence in the article is due to the mass editing, which started with a note about the playability of Zandalari warlocks. This NPC is a testament to the existence of Zandalari warlocks (edit: and perhaps not even), but has no relevancy to demoniacs, which seem to me as removed from warlocks as demon hunters. Azarchius (talk) 23:28, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
- We only assume that he is a Warlock base on his abilities so he isn't really confirmed to be a Warlock. — Surafbrov T / C 23:24, 12 November 2018 (UTC)