Talk:Alliance bias

I'm sorry but almost all point in the poor leaders is terrible the only real points is lorthemar and garrosh models, the rest are just very interesting plot points ready to be resolved--Ashbear160 (talk) 00:08, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

No edit wars. If there is a problem, I want both sides to talk it out before continuing. If one or both sides is needlessly stubborn, I may take action.--SWM2448 00:23, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

The horde can clearly get horses, arguing against this point is a outright lie, saying they can't get access to human horses is like saying the the alliance doesn't get acess to all the other mounts the horde has it's ultimately redudant.--Ashbear160 (talk) 00:26, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

And now he's removing the joke at end...--Ashbear160 (talk) 00:29, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

Paladin mounts do not count as their model is quite different from the human horse model seen here.

http://www.wowpedia.org/File:Swift_Brown_Steed.jpg

Also stop insinuating that this this article is less legitimate or ruins a joke by the virtue of existing.

Copperblast (talk) 00:31, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

You get access the horses, saying that they don't get access to human horses is a stupid argument not whinning at least come with a better term instead of just saying "human horses"

Well it did ruin a joke but that's besides the point, it's a silly article and at the end of this one i put one that slanders the horde bias article, it's supposed to be funny, if you can't find this funny at least trade it for something that you find funny, and don't just leave it blank because you don't like it.--Ashbear160 (talk) 00:38, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

Ashbear, you see to be making up "rules" about what is and is not funny.[1] You are not the authority on this issue, and you can not control pages. Perhaps I should revert everything to the original joke and leave it at that.--SWM2448 01:05, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

I'm personally in favor of simply deleting both faction bias articles entirely. The entire concept has gone way beyond "silly" and fully into bickering and complaining, something which surprises me not one bit after reading the official forums for any length of time. -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 01:21, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

I would be fine with reverting to the original joke, the end was ruined anyway, this is a silly article it had a joke at the end, he removed i put another, i'm not making up rules or being authority, i just don't think that because you don't like the joke you should delete it.--Ashbear160 (talk) 01:32, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

Ashybear160 stop messing with this page

You've been messing with this page since day 1 and I'm getting sick of it. If you don't agree with what's written here then stop going to this small section of wowpedia. Copperblast (talk) 05:54, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

What i just pointed a fact that the forsaken can't use the light was mentioned the same spot where the cult of the forgotten shadow was explained.--Ashbear160 (talk) 15:32, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

Forget it baggins was the cause of that...--Ashbear160 (talk) 15:36, 27 December 2010 (UTC)