Forum:Apparel, Accessories, etc.

From Warcraft Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forums: Village pump → Apparel, Accessories, etc.
(This topic is archived. Please do not edit this page!)

Would apparel, accessories, toys, collectibles, gear be appropriate to be added on to at least one article that has information of them all in sections or separate articles explaining about each one or completely ignore this? The ones that are related to Warcraft are the ones I'm suggesting to be added.

This is the website I'm suggesting with the stuff I would like to add, because they are official licensed Blizzard products and I was wondering if it'll be alright if I may add these that are related to Warcraft. If its alright that I may add them, may I have an opinion on how I may add them? I was thinking of adding them to just one article containing information about them, in maybe sections, and maybe have redirects from the name of those products to that main article; instead of having many articles talking one product that has very little information unnecessary for their own article. --— SurafbrovWarcraft Wiki administrator T / C 22:38, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Also just to point it out, when I meant products related to Warcraft, I meant the World of Warcraft section, the Hearthstone section, and some that may be in the Heroes of the Storm section. If you don't agree to this, can you please give out your opinion (below) of why you do not agree to this? Thanks! — SurafbrovWarcraft Wiki administrator T / C 22:45, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

This would be off-topic per Project:DNP, in my opinion: even if the designs draw from Warcraft, there's little we can say beyond "This t-shirt/mug/iphone/toy case is/was sold by Blizzard and depicts a pandaren", which has about zero relevance to the Warcraft universe.
I don't see any benefits to creating a replica of their storefront on the wiki. For things that happen to intersect with other content that we do cover, like  [Gryphon Hatchling], it seems sufficient to include the store in external links. — foxlit (talk) 23:04, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
That seems reasonable and explained (makes sense). Alright, thanks foxlit. :) — SurafbrovWarcraft Wiki administrator T / C 00:24, 26 August 2014 (UTC)