Warcraft Wiki talk:Vandalism policy
 |
This policy has been adopted.
|
Proposal and Vote Archives
The initial policy was adopted around 8 Feb 2006. See Project talk:Policy/Vandalism/Adoption1 for the vote.
The definition of a vandal was previously on Project:Vandalism. It is now integrated in the policy itself. The archived votes on the definition are now in Project talk:Policy/Vandalism/Definition1 and Project talk:Policy/Vandalism/Definition2.
- Past discussions archived to...
- ...Warcraft Wiki talk:Vandalism policy/Archive01 Archived
11:01, 17 September 2006 (EDT)
- ...Warcraft Wiki talk:Vandalism policy/Archive01 Archived
Minor Penalty Change Decreed
|
This policy was decreed as policy by an admin and implemented.
|
As an admin who does alot of blocking of vandals, I'm making a minor change declaration to the penalties. Since their is no preset in the blocking UI for 10 years, the penalty for 20 or more acts of vandalism is going to be permanent ban, since the next highest preset is infinite (∞). --Fandyllic 5:01 PM PST 22 Mar 2006
| # of Acts Vandalism | Block Time |
|---|---|
| 20 acts or more |
∞ permanent |
Comments
Put any comments about the change above here...
Minor Penalty Change Decreed
|
This policy was decreed as policy by an admin and implemented.
|
Admins seem to be using 3 months a s a block time, but it isn't currently in the policy, so I'm making a small change that adds it. --
Fandyllic (talk · contr) 3:21 PM PST 10 Jan 2008
| # of Acts Vandalism | Block Time |
|---|---|
| 5 acts (to 9 acts) |
∞ 1-3 months |
Comments
Put any comments about the change above here...
New discussions
Interpretation of block time
Just a quick note to mention that the ban times noted are a guideline for admins and need not be followed to the letter - you can use your judgement to decide whether the penalties should be harsher or lighter than those mentioned. For example, a gold seller I will infinitely ban no matter the number of edits (one is enough) because it is obvious they are not here to contribute to the wiki. -- Kirkburn (talk) 20:11, 25 December 2006 (EST)
Update
Just did a small update to clarify methods of appeal and to include the above comment about block lengths being guidelines. Kirkburn talk contr 12:49, 24 December 2007 (UTC)