User talk:Sandwichman2448/Archive03

Request to upload smaller version of image

Hey, caould you upload a smaller version of Image:Meatwagonwow.jpg? At over 350K its pretty huge. -- Fandyllic (talk · contr) 11:06 PM PST 16 Dec 2007

Sure! As soon as I figure out how... --SWM24 48 21:16, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

Made a resize for you: Image:Meatwagonwow.jpg. Feel free to replace the original with my version.--gOurra 02:29, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Wow. Much thanks. What happened to number two though?--SWM24 48 02:32, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Eh that's an error from me, I had a number two but it was too big so I skipped it.--gOurra 13:13, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Sky's re-uploaded it over the original - see Image:Meatwagonwow.jpg. Kirkburn talk contr 02:39, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the User Page revert!

I always notice when someone changes my page, and I wanted to thank you for changing back Acharai's changes to it today. However, in defense of Acharai, if you compare his version to mine, he actually removed several somewhat derogatory remarks regarding me being a "glorified forum troll." Since I'm the one who used that phrase in the first place, I didn't mind it being there, but his edit to my user page was more complimentary than vandalism. I don't want Acharai to get unfairly labeled. Palehoof 21:41, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

I may have misread the difference. I will remove Acharai from the list of violations if you are fine with the contribution. I just saw things removed, I put them back, now it is removed again by me.--SWM24 48 21:46, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Hi.

Hey,can you please take out the space inbeetween the / and the T.Thank you!User:Airiph/sig00:09, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

I can try.--SWM24 48 00:55, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

thanks!User:Airiph/sig01:07, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Now there is an unneeded space somewhere.--SWM24 48 01:08, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Oh,lol,this happened before,just I dont remember how I fixed itUser:Airiph/sig01:10, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Well, if you can fix it, try to. I forget how too.--SWM24 48 01:14, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Ok,well thank you for the helpUser:Airiph/sig01:15, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

I am sorry I can not be more help.--SWM24 48 01:17, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Lol,its fine,you helped rightUser:Airiph/sig,01:27, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Ey,is it Ok if I see yout signiture?Because you heve the stuff with no space between and no messed up time.btw,im putin 3 ~'s a comma and 5 ~'sUser:Airiph/sig,01:33, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

You can look all you need, just do not edit it please.--SWM24 48 01:34, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

OkUser:Airiph/sig,01:35, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Yay!Thank you for the help again!*Yawns*G`night.User:Airiph/sig 01:54, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Ogri'la ogres

I'd suggest making a specific article for them, or adding more to the ogri'la page about how they differ from standard ogres and ogre mages. The lore discussiong the fact they are different. It just confuses things to have info specific to them listed under stanard ogre or ogre mage articles.Baggins 00:41, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

If this is about going against the consensus, I am sorry, but I found the source of my comment. He says something like that.--SWM24 48 01:17, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

I meant that Kronk isn't a ogre mage, he's something different, he's something more than an ogre mage, all ogri'la ogres are more than regular ogres. Something about the crystals according to the game quests and lore.Baggins 01:28, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

So what do you want me to do?--SWM24 48 01:29, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Well an expansion to the Ogri'la article discussing the lore and differences between Ogri'la ogres and other ogres would be nice I suppose.Baggins 01:33, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

I can try, but my edit shows that I can not tell the difference.--SWM24 48 01:36, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

claim for deletion

User:Wired's previous name. Where did he say that? Thanks --Sky (talk | con | wh) 21:02, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

Good call. He said that on IRC, but because no one wants to go through the logs, you should ignore it or ask Wired about it.--SWM24 48 21:37, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

IRC is enough for me, with or without the logs. That whole, Assume Good Faith deal. =) --Sky (t | c | w) 21:38, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

You know what, I will go through the logs!--SWM24 48 21:48, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

It was here at 22:54.10! Read that part if you want.--SWM24 48 21:53, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

Wolf

Yes on talk wolf SwM --Igotanger 21:27, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

ok I'm back

Read Talk:Wolf.--SWM24 48 21:32, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

thank you...

...for the warm welcome. --Hojimachong 01:12, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Oh, don't mention it. Welcome to the wiki!--SWM24 48 01:13, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

New ideas page cleanup

If you have the time, I could use some help cleaning up class ideas, please. Basically it should be rearranged into several sections, I.E, class ideas based on official material (warcraft rpg, books, manuals, etc), a section devoted to class ideas from D&D roleplaying in general, non official classes but popular in general fantasy (as for formatting these should require a small paragraph from a related D&D sourcebook), and last a section devoted to fan made class ideas (note these should probably just be links to player pages, much like we did for expansion ideas).

Thanks for your help in advance, if you feel you can get around to it.Baggins 19:17, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Sure! I can try, but I do not own the D&D books.--SWM24 48 21:23, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Besides the Warcraft RPG, and a few star wars rpg books, neither do I. If it helps check out the denied class section at the end of the article that I added last night. Also to research some of the class names you might need to google them :p...Baggins 21:31, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

What do I do with Possible future hero classes? Seems repeat-ish...--SWM24 48 17:37, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

I started that long long time ago. Would probably suggest a short blurb in the section, move the content to class ideas, and then link to "class ideas" using {{seealso}}. --Sky (t | c | w) 05:07, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Hi

Thanks for the welcome! I'm trying to find stuff on wowwiki to fix up and change, I'm new to wiki stuff, it's pretty exciting. :) Ylime 18:09, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

I am glad you think so, and hope you will enjoy helping.--SWM24 48 18:10, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Little Obnoxious?

"How about a server subpage? We have ways we do things.--SWM2448 00:39, 4 December 2007 (UTC)"

I'm happy for the input, but just because you have "Ways you do things" doesn't neccessarily mean its wrong. I'm obviously ALLOWED to have my character as a subpage of my page. TheAdamant 19:36, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

If I remember correctly you did not want a subpage at all. I moved it, then you moved it back. It was a suggestion. I am sorry if you took it offensively.--SWM24 48 19:37, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Eh, that was a mistake. I'd get in trouble if I didn't have it as a subpage, though it escapes me why I can't redirect the article to my subpage. *facedesk* TheAdamant 05:42, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

To make it up to you, tell me what do you want done and I will do it for you. :) --SWM24 48 16:49, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Eh. I got a message from one of the mods, I thinks, that says I can't redirect "Alekas Er'ando" to my page. Though, I don't understand why . . Several other people have. (Kodar, Zamboozle) Mind telling me if I'm doing anything wrong? D: TheAdamant 20:31, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

This page? User:TheAdamant/Alekas Er'ando --SWM24 48 20:52, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Yep. The redirect got blasted by KD3, I think. Its on my discussion page. I'm rather confused. --TheAdamant 22:16, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

I see what you are saying. I have asked for clarity.--SWM24 48 01:40, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Any luck? TheAdamant 22:26, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

KD3 created and proposed this new rule. It is not agreed on yet, so you can voice any complaints.--SWM24 48 02:40, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

I'll happily do so. -.- --TheAdamant 20:21, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Having difficulty identifying official source material...

As I'm trying to clean up grammar and general legibility of the pages, I'm running into difficulty; I have come to understand the cited sections as being quoted from official sources or publications, but these sections often contain grammar and syntax errors that I can't believe were present in those original sources.

Certainly, I suppose that other users might have corrupted these pieces of information - I don't own most of the pen-and-paper RPG books to revert to original quotes... but it's often hard to distinguish individual contributions from official sources, especially when paragraphs intermix between cited source and personal contribution.

Any suggestions?—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Magnutc (talk · contr).

In a perfect world they should not intermix, but if they do, my advice would be to maybe look at the page history or ask Baggins (He puts most of it up in the first place). Also, please sign with ~~~~ so we know who is who.--SWM24 48 22:44, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks!

That is very noticable indeed :)—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ashera (talk · contr).

Welcome.--SWM24 48 23:51, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Compleat Engineer

Thanks for the catch. I must be dyslexic; I thought I'd gotten the right name from whatever source it was... --Eirik Ratcatcher 02:21, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

You are welcome. I just try to help.--SWM24 48 02:23, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

How do you do that table chart of your characters?

I need my characters in that same form as your characters! (The Table Chart)

Can you tell me how to do that chart on my talk page? Frostworn1822 04:55, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

I took it from Fandyllic. He says anyone is free to use it.--SWM24 48 22:06, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Stormreaver standard

Where did you get the picture of the Stormreaver standard? Where in WoW can I find it? -- Shandris talk / contribs 13:37, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Fine, you can delete it.

--SWM24 48 20:48, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

I just asked if was in-game, where then? Not that it's fake...or is it? =P -- Shandris talk / contribs 18:46, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

I doubt it is in-game. I just uploaded all the clan banners in the model files. You do not have to call me a liar, just a dataminer.--SWM24 48 20:43, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

So will you have it deleted, or what? Why the quiet? Was I rude?--SWM24 48 20:50, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

I was just curious where you could see the Stormreaver clan in WoW, that's all =)) Don't bother, I've got nothing against you. -- Shandris talk / contribs 09:37, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Is it not still datamined?--SWM24 48 16:23, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Varedis beta picture

You ask why it is useless in Varedis. First off, there's already a better quality picture of him on the page, which is derived from the English client, rather than the Korean one. Secondly, it fails the guidelines on WW:IMAGE: "NPC portraits should...Be cropped to the NPC's shape".AMBER^(RΘCK) 23:56, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

It is a picture of early TBC dev. If pictures of the alpha/beta at the point it was taken are allowed, I feel it should be kept for historical reasons.--SWM24 48 23:59, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

There's nothing special about that picture. Correct me if I'm wrong, but the Varedis encounter hasn't been changed since the beta. There isn't anything "historic" about this picture.AMBER^(RΘCK) 00:13, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

If this is the case, and there is no differences besides the lack of quality, by all means kill it. :D --SWM24 48 00:15, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

The Park history

Yeah, when i said that the park used to prosper and stuff, it was implying that back when it was used for leisure activities (as it says in the lore) that it had those shops ACTIVE, they arnt anymore. But i put The cords their to let ppl know that abandon places exist (abandon cuz the merchants arnt their anymore, possibly cuz of the war, as they are away):—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Elmo88 (talk · contr).

While the shops do exist empty, exactly what lore has info about them?--SWM24 48 20:58, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

M1330

Frankly, I don't have any of the books to check for myself... but talk about contradicting ones self. In an attempt to prevent further edits I included his speculation, that he made [1]. Then after some of your changes he does this [2]... I really don't know to leave it as it, or just continue to revert his changes at this point. Sssssssssssssssssssssssss For Pony! ^{{TDon't hiss at me.•CIf you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all.)} 20:04, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

I do not understand what he was getting at with Thel'danis (and many other pages), but it seems a mess. I would prefer you continued to revert his changes. I will help you if I have time. I have questioned him about his edits, and am awaiting a response.--SWM24 48 20:24, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Good luck, first time I had actually seen him respond to a comment was to Eirik Ratcatcher. It wasn't a problem at first, he'd do one or two things then go away for a couple of days, but now hes doing several daily... I added him to the vandals list. Anyone else doing the same thing would already be on it.

^{{TDon't hiss at me.•CIf you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all.)} 20:34, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

You beat me to it. I was going to give him one more chance (edit), but he deserves it. 98%? Did you do the math, or is that just a guess? Not that I am disagreeing...--SWM24 48 20:40, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

It's more of a guess... But if I did the math, I'd probably only be off maybe by 5.

^{{TDon't hiss at me.•CIf you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all.)} 20:47, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Did the math, and not counting talk pages, edits to his own pages, or uploaded images (assuming my math is correct), his contributes have only been kept 6.6% of the time. Meaning his edits were reverted/changed 93.4% of the time. I guessed pretty close. =) Sssssssssssssssssssssssss For Pony! ^{{TDon't hiss at me.•CIf you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all.)} 21:33, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Nice.--SWM24 48 19:49, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Fan Fiction not allowed?

Awww, I really wanted to be part of the World of Warcraft storyline :(

Well thats too bad I guess, please delete the sub-title —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Fzzz5x (talk · contr).

You're allowed to make fanfic, but it's been asked that you do not add it to the lore/npc pages. It can cause confusion to those looking only for facts.

^{{TDon't hiss at me.•CIf you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all.)} 21:10, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Read the guidelines. You can have your fan fiction on a user subpage. What 'sub-title' do you want me to remove?--SWM24 48 00:31, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

my talkpage

hey just thanks 4 the welcome--Andersmusician talk 00:02, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

It should have been given to you sooner really.--SWM24 48 00:13, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

I never got a welcome =( --

^{{TDon't hiss at me.•CIf you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all.)} 01:50, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

I am really shocked. You never got one? You, one of the most active users, was never welcomed??--SWM24 48 19:47, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

I got a link to a welcomeUser:Airiph/sig 19:47, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Well, I think I didn't get one, cause of how old my account is. I made it some months before I even started editing, but I had created my page... and talk page I believe, I myself don't welcome members that have edits more than a week old... So I assume it was the same with me.

^{{TDon't hiss at me.•CIf you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all.)} 19:55, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Well Airiph, I thought it was a much more formal process back then. Coobra, I think you were not welcomed because you had added to your talk page (at a glance, Red Link=Not Welcomed/Blue Link=Welcomed). The Committee that is charged with welcoming seems to be just Pcj and Fandy, so I need to try harder.--SWM24 48 19:59, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Yea, thats what I thought. But its ok... I rather not have that big block on my talk page =P

^{{TDon't hiss at me.•CIf you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all.)} 20:50, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Rumored Races

Should I move my original Rumored Races page back into my namespace? That's an article that's mostly fan-fic. --Xmuskrat 23:55, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Your page is now called Future race ideas, and seems to be no longer made up of fan fiction (though the links at the bottom still are mostly). An archive of a Pre-TBC version is preserved as Burning Crusade's rumored races. If you want some of your work back I can help find it. I am sorry if this is disappointing to you.--SWM24 48 01:29, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

I think there just isn't any standard on what is speculation or not. I still don't see the difference between my original speculation of what races might be in the game vs. my speculation on what undermine might look like. How is "Future Race ideas" anything but speculation? All I ever did was write speculation here. What makes one good and the other bad? --Xmuskrat 02:02, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

I dunno. What changed? I never said anything was bad.--SWM24 48 02:07, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Finish It

Do you plan to finish the Saga of the Bucket any time soon? Mr.X8 Talk Contribs 23:28, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

It is good to know it is not forgotten. I remember you were strangely unhappy with the plot, and my questions on how to fix it were responded to with comments that, while related to the story, did not answer what I asked. I felt is best to postpone work on the project until the problem was solved, in order to prevent the work from extending in an unliked direction to a point where it would have been too late to rewrite.--SWM24 48 23:45, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Well even though in the corner of my mind I knew I was a sucky-ass writer, I have come to terms with it. So in order for the felkarr to prevail, I have to back-off. You have my promise I won't interupt you RE-WRITING it. I don't want to see my horible work so if you don't mind destroying it and re-writing it, maybe in the funny-as-hell style you have. Mr.X8 Talk Contribs 00:59, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

...Do not be so hard on yourself. 'sucky-ass' and 'strangely unhappy with the plot' are not the same thing.--SWM24 48 01:05, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

I know that. It'a just when I see stuff like User:Joshmaul/Joshmaul the Warlock, I know many 5-a-day FFs don't even hold a candle to it. Mr.X8 Talk Contribs 01:17, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Why do you bring this up? When I have to hold a candle to things, I use an old brass lantern.--SWM24 48 01:52, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

hellfire peninsula edit

"By foot, or presumably by flight path" gives more information then "Normal" and not every one knows that (like people how are for the first time and never played world of warcraft before) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jollonk (talk · contr).

Confusing Edit

Not sure what's going on here. What point and vandalism are you referring to, and how is that related to Medivh? --Tyrsenus t c 20:37, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

The point that M'uru's spark appears identical to the Ashbringer crystal is not as strong as it could be, as that doodad is recycled in many places throughout the game, such as in Medivh's ritual. The possible vandalism was me adding that image as a rude counterpoint, in the stead of me saying this on the talk page and waiting for comments.--SWM24 48 20:46, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Fixed. --Tyrsenus t c 21:24, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Welcome

Thanks for the welcome but I've been here a week or so now, lol :D . Thanks again —The preceding unsigned comment was added by RealmS (talk · contr).

So, you're not worth welcoming if you'd been here a week?

^{{TDon't hiss at me.•CIf you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all.)} 20:35, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Language stuff

Why? --Sky (t · c · w) 23:00, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

I have always thought it was mixing together on a few pages. I will undo it. I just thought it would be a good idea to have a guide of what NPCs are saying and a lore-based dictionary. I got the idea from Talk:Draconic.--SWM24 48 23:02, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

I left a comment in Talk:Draconic on a related issue.Baggins (talk) 00:18, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Big things come in small packages

It's a amazing what a difference two letters can make huh? :p http://www.wowwiki.com/index.php?title=Gun%27Drak&curid=33260&diff=1388362&oldid=1388355 -- Zeal ^(T/C) 00:52, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Yeh. Is it correct? The Zul'Drak page says that.--SWM24 48 01:47, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

I beleive it to be correct, though it's not something the alpha can confirm as it's an unfinished zone and restricted even to testers. They've been sacrificing to their gods all along, that's what trolls do. To state the obvious and say it has driven them mad makes little sense, so it should be that they actually sacrificed their gods rather than to them. Plus the original link supports that wording too. -- Zeal ^(T/C) 02:07, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Alpha corrections

You can get away with http://www.wowwiki.com/index.php?title=Grizzly_Hills&diff=1389360&oldid=1387075 because it's still not the correct name, and the new name you've given it is merely a description of what the pic appears to be supported by alpha info of what it's not. ;) The evidence for it being Venture Co. is publically available and in plain sight. -- Zeal ^(T/C) 02:36, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

The Nuke of Edit Reverts

I've noticed a certain user has been taking over another user's FF while he has been dormant and there's been so much edits it'll take forever to revert it. Is there any way we can just bring it back to the way the person last left it? Mr.X8 Talk Contribs 23:47, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Yes, I can, but do you really want to???--SWM24 48 23:49, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Yes but maybe you should see my logic in this.

Say you started to go into your (kickassing-ly funny) Cashbringer, but because of problems leave this site for 2 years. Then let's say in the time you were gone, a user makes an account, sees you've been dormant awhile, then takes over your fanfic, turning it into something completely different. Let's say he makes it from a funny article to a serious one that's involoved in his FFs. When you came back much to your chagrin, you see Cashbringer is now the sword used by "Zarg the Conquerer" of User:So-and-so's FF. You wouldn;t lik it. So if User:KKRP comes back to see User:Lazlow 28 has turned his pretty cool stories into something he doesn't like at all. Mr.X8 Talk Contribs 23:56, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

This seems to be up to KKRP, but as he is not here, I will undo the edits.--SWM24 48 23:59, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

All 30 of them? That'll take like an hour. Mr.X8 Talk Contribs 00:00, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

I'm a Watchdog.--SWM24 48 00:02, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

There's also this nifty thing called "page history". Just click on an old version and press save.--g0urra[T҂C] 00:03, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Well, it is done. He could have been a valuable contributor to your fan fiction series.--SWM24 48 00:12, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

I'm not in the bussiness of FF anymore. I'm just going to fix stuff. Do you always have to be so obnoxious all the time Gourra? That gets really annoying... Mr.X8 Talk Contribs 02:48, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Unit navbox project

Template:Warcraft III units. Yes, no, maybe? Just my 2s of trying to be helpful.--g0urra[T҂C] 22:36, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

My first thought: Wow. That is a lot better than I (and most other people) could do.--SWM24 48 22:40, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Hehe. Well, my first thought was "4 RTS factions? That's a shitload of groups to do" then I thought of this. You might want to check this out too.--g0urra[T҂C] 22:48, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks again.--SWM24 48 01:21, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

alpa info

i know that adding alpa info is not allowed (or i know it now...), but there is still big article about DK´s abilities. Kesmana (talk) 09:57, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

"Uldoom"

Don't know if you're using first hand, a summary from one of many websites (which are often misleading in their summaries), or a full transcript for http://www.wowwiki.com/index.php?title=World_of_Warcraft:_Wrath_of_the_Lich_King&curid=117259&diff=1436543&oldid=1436253 but i made notes during the panel and i don't recall Cory saying "old world content". Rob Pardo was the one who later added to the answer and brought up Grim Batol.

The reason I believe they confused things, is because we initially saw Ulduar written as Uldoom in early WotLK info, which was clearly wrong. When answering the question, Cory said "Uldoom", not Uldum. Up until this latest answer, the statement has always been that there are no plans for Uldum and that it is something they would like to do later. This has even been said recently in interviews for WotLK, so a complete flip of that statement now seems strange. -- Zeal ^(T/C) 08:19, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

I was using a cross between WOWinsider's transcript and a video of them talking for that particular edit. Sorry for any mistakes.--SWM24 48 16:20, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

No mistakes, and no worries. I could be wrong, was just discussing it with you. :p -- Zeal ^(T/C) 16:24, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

--SWM24 48 16:25, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

You linked it, so you make it

I eagerly await what you plan to do with "Rescheduled for visitation"... --Eirik Ratcatcher (talk) 21:54, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

I get the hint. I was really just putting it out there.--SWM24 48 21:56, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

ROFL. Really, though, your edit(s) pointed me at other of your comments, that perhaps some of the WotLK content would involve Uldum in some way. Hope that my small addition was of some help to you. Sadly, I have not got even an inkling what I would do for a "rescheduled for visitation" page. A reference on the Titans page to that comment might not go amiss, though. --Eirik Ratcatcher (talk) 22:05, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

The fate of Uldum is uncertain. The only info I know of for sure is from the Stone Watcher of Norgannon (your work). There is a fan fiction about it, but that should not be linked from any factual page.--SWM24 48 22:34, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Battlegrounds

Thanks for adding Gurubashi Catacombs to the Battlegrounds page for me. I made the page and added it to the template. I'm very interested in canceled material, and I plan on digging around for more info. It's just a plus that it was the driving force leading to the implementation of Arenas.

Thanks again! Omniferous (talk) 00:38, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Well thank you. I do what I can.--SWM24 48 21:39, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Bookkeepers

After a lengthy absence, the WoWWiki:Bookkeepers are returning. Our goals will be the same as the previous group, maintaining and improving the lore pages, et cetera. This is a formal invitation for you to join out the group. You'd be doing much the same as you've been doing, but you would also be involved in Bookkeeper projects and initiatives. You've been quite the lore activist for some time, and I'm pretty sure we owe you one, so consider this acceptance of your long-ago application, if you want it.--Ragestorm (talk · contr) 16:46, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

Thank you very much. I graciously accept.-SWM24 48 00:45, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Apothecary Society info

Not "not valid", its just past tense history, as in 1-2 years before the original World of Warcraft, 3-4 years or so before Wrath. It just meeds to be paraphrased into past tense, and additional events added to it. It could use the updates from Horde Player's Guide time period (just before TBC), and wrath of the lich king info.Baggins (talk) 03:44, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

I know that. Semantics. I was both stating why his edits were an honest mistake, and over generalizing. Thanks anyway.--SWM24 48 01:21, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Wind rider

Just a quick poke: http://www.battle.net/war3/orc/units/windrider.shtml g0urra[T҂C] 01:30, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

Oh, thank you. The manual says different, but it should not be a redirect either way.--SWM24 48 16:11, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

Wailing Caverns right eye socket cave - Accuracy

Was there something in particular that needs citation? Madkaugh (talk) 17:06, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

I felt the name could be better, as it is very conjectural and a description in itself. I did not have a suggestion for a better name, so I could not use {{move}}, as that requires an alternative name. I can see how my edit made little sense.--SWM24 48 21:04, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

My original goal in naming it was to clearly distinguish what location the article was about. The name is cumbersome; it is a description, which may be inappropriate. It is not conjectural at all. It states what the cave is. As far as I know, the cave does not have a published official name, if it did, that would be the one to use. Calling it "Eye socket cave" might work better (until another eye socket cave gets put into the game). "Wailing Caverns quest cave" is ambiguous, sounds like the main caverns. "Wailing caverns quest giver's cave"? Still too long. "Deviate recipes cave"? That will probably remain unique and apropos, doesn't address the landscape, but does address one reason the cave is important.

The reference to Wailing Caverns in the title is useful, but could be dropped - linking and text in the article ties the article to the Wailing Caverns.

The word "right" could be dropped from the title with little ambiguity. When I originally edited the article, I was cleaning up references to "left eye socket", which is incorrect and misleading - somewhat irritating to jump down into the wrong eye socket and have to start over. I suppose I fixated on that feature. That level of detail really belongs in the article, not the title.

"eye socket" - it's kind of the distinguishing feature, why this location stands out feature-wise, how to visually find it.

"cave" - either "Wailing Caverns eye socket" or "Eye socket cave", but not just "Eye socket", that's just too ambiguous.

Looking these over, the name seems to need either "Wailing Caverns" or "cave" or both, and some distinguishing trait. I'm leaning toward "Eye socket cave", the hazard of a future ambiguity not withstanding. Thoughts?Madkaugh (talk) 03:13, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the help!

(MonikerXJinx (talk) 23:14, 4 December 2008 (UTC))

You're welcome.--SWM24 48 23:18, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

Dalaran split

And your reason for splitting Dalaran is...what? There is no other city split like that and there was no reason after the split template was put in on the talk page. g0urra[T҂C] 22:17, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

There was a reason. Take it how you will to. I will not twist Ragestorm's comments into justification for my actions, but he did comment.--SWM24 48 22:25, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Bah, missed that one. It looks fine, but perhaps add some infoboxes. And categories. Shiny. g0urra[T҂C] 22:30, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

All right. No worries.

--SWM24 48 22:33, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Navigation menu

Search