Template talk:User Deadmines
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
--Xavius 17:15, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
This is a joke. Right?--SWM2448 20:34, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
lol. User:IbbertTheGnome/Sig 19:38, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
Delete vote
Not a real accomplishment.--g0urra[T҂C] 13:52, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
Anyone actually using it? I had modified it to use the InstanceBox I created, but only because it was listed amongst the User templates... *shrugs* delete it :D DSXC (talk) 05:46, 5 June 2008 (UTC)DSXC
- Actually a lot of people are using it, as a joke mostly, so I'd say keep this one, but delete the others.
{T •C ) 23:17, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
- The reasons I've seen to delete this and other low level instance user templates have been pretty weak so far. Why don't we just delete the Deadmines instance info from the Deadmines article or any instance info from all instance articles under level 30 say? It isn't much of an accomplishment, so why do people even need notes about it? --
Fandyllic (talk · contr) 1:11 PM PST 13 Jun 2008
- The reasons I've seen to delete this and other low level instance user templates have been pretty weak so far. Why don't we just delete the Deadmines instance info from the Deadmines article or any instance info from all instance articles under level 30 say? It isn't much of an accomplishment, so why do people even need notes about it? --
- Because these low-level instances does not require in-depth tactics, consumables, raid groups, or other things that signifies of real accomplishments. For example I can solo all non-raid pre-Burning Crusade instances with my level 70 paladin, does that make an accomplishment? No, it does not. While on the other hand if I am to slay Onyxia, clear Blackwing Lair or any other raid instance, I will need many more people to do it. g0urra[T҂C] 22:16, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
- I thinks these low level instance boxes are kind of funny and if someone preferrers to have Gnomeregan over Dead Mines on the personal page, why not... Keep it, it doesn't really hurt or messes the wiki if they are kept Ricdak (talk) 21:21, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
I don't see any reason to delete this, whether it is used as a joke or not. Kirkburn talk contr 14:20, 12 July 2008 (UTC)