Template talk:Outdated
New version
just a proposal, and i dunno if you saw my i-note test template or not. but how about this?
I don't really see the point in adding may or article(especially this, as it's an inline template, not for use on whole articles, just sections). --Zealtalkcontrweb 08:22, 23 January 2007 (EST)
- Sure, changed.--Hobinheim (talk · contr) 09:55, 23 January 2007 (EST)
Broken?
When I add the OOD tag to a section, it will not allow it to be on its own line. See Blacksmithing proficiencies. RobertM525 04:01, 8 March 2007 (EST)
Radical Changes
Seeing as this template has reverted back to an article scope and now uses {{Ambox}} can someone update the documentation to reflect it's no longer used for sections nor to behaves as it did previously (inline) and remove the mention of it being based on my inote design. :/ --
- <imagelink>http://www.zealvurte.co.uk/temp/sig-av/wiki_zeal.png%7CUser:Zeal</imagelink>
- <imagelink>http://www.zealvurte.co.uk/temp/sig-av/wiki_talk.png%7CUser talk:Zeal</imagelink>
- <imagelink>http://www.zealvurte.co.uk/temp/sig-av/wiki_contribs.png%7CSpecial:Contributions/Zeal</imagelink>
- <imagelink>http://www.zealvurte.co.uk/temp/sig-av/wiki_end.png%7CUser:Zeal</imagelink>
11:27, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
- Good point - tweaked. Note that this design also has a reason input. Kirkburn talk contr 18:20, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
Problem with reason and elinks
{{OOD|There are 55 librams now and only 37 listed. See [http://www.wowhead.com/?items=4.7&filter=ub=2;ma=1 wowhead] for a complete list.}}
But just remove the elink, and it's fine.. I really don't know why that is.
{{OOD|There are 55 librams now and only 37 listed. See wowhead for a complete list.}}
Probably a simple fix I'm just not seeing. Can anyone help? Thanks! 
Howbizr(t·c) 4:48 PM, 9 Jun 2009 (EDT)
- The link URL contains =, which causes the parser to think that you're trying to pass a named parameter. Use explicit {{ood|reason=Things with links}} syntax to avoid that. -- foxlit (talk) 18:11, December 30, 2009 (UTC)