Template talk:Guildprogress bcraid1 header

PLEASE!! Do not change the Guild progression templates to another formatting without discussing it on this page first! I'm reverting them all back to what they were originally as there's numerous pages that were using that format that have had their formatting thrown completely off by the changes. If you want to have a different format, use a different name and build them separate from the default ones. I'll be going through all the pages that were broken by the undiscussed change in format and fixing them tomorrow--Roach 03:20, 7 June 2007 (UTC).

In the name of discussion, then, I vote for the removal of Zul'Aman in favor of the addition of the Black Temple and Hyjal, because Zul'Aman isn't in-game (and isn't likely to be for a few months at least) while the other two are. - Dark T Zeratul 03:40, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

That's what I'm doing now. I'm going through and fixing the pages that the change broke as I have more time tonight then I thought I would to do so. Mainly because Zul, while confirmed, is expected to be a 10 man and there's not likely to be anymore 25 man raids added before the next expansion so they should all fit.--Roach 04:15, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

They should all be ok now. For the most part. At least no pages are horribly broke anymore. I'll do another, more thorough scan tomorrow off all the pages using them to make sure though.--Roach 04:28, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

My bad on the template changes. I didn't realize all sections used the same templates, and was just trying to update the one for my server. I'll leave them alone for now if they're being updated globally down the road. Mostly just trying to alleviate the duplication of Hyjal & BT on the progression lists. Metasynman 17:44, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

I was unduly harsh. Tbh, the other template for 25 mans should be deleted. But yes, just about every server that tracks guild progression has this on their page. :x --Sky (t · c · w)

You're right. My bad for not removing the redundant template from the Guildprogress create tbc page when they were consolidated. I've fixed the page so anyone who imports it in the future will have the correct templates included. Also marking the 2nd template for deletion as the only page using it is a sandbox and it can only lead to more confusion as long as it exists. --Roach 02:17, 13 July 2007 (UTC)