Template talk:Cut gems adjective table

I have changed the color schema to make it easier to read (at least on my lap top). Please feed back whether it is better or worse (or unreadable) on your machine. Tequima (talk)

It is absolutely disgusting, seriously. I already had a few complaints there was too much color at the beginning when the table was halfway between this and before. Don't take it personnal, I am reverting your change. Before making drastic changes could we discuss about it? Is the background color too sober for you or is it the text that you can't read? In that case we could increase the size of the text. But don't alter the background color, I actually invested a lot of time about getting the right hues. I asked many people too before getting a good compromise. Xhamon (talk) 20:04, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

And for Jrooksjr, as far as I know, hexadecimal codes for colors are a standard and should not be a problem on any browser. They call the colors that doesn't use multiples of 33 in their code "unsafe" because a 216 colors display would round them (at this point I care more about this page being appealing to most people rather than supporting dinosaurs). Xhamon (talk) 20:14, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

I increased text size, tell me if that does the trick for you. Xhamon (talk) 20:14, 21 August 2009 (UTC)