Talk:Second invasion

From Warcraft Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Votes

Delete
  1. Delete ClydeJr 09:31, 3 July 2006 (EDT) - (Voting in order to preserve the gray matter of all wowwiki readers)


Keep
  1. Keep Jeoh 06:59, 16 June 2006 (EDT) - (I do not know whether there was a SBLI, but if there was this is quite important, however the stub should be changed to {{Stub/Lore}}.)
  2. Keep Ralthor 12:19, 3 July 2006 (EDT) - (Mikk makes a good case for keeping it)
  3. Keep Mikk 13:25, 4 July 2006 (EDT) - (Change to keep after following Ragestorm's advice)
  4. Keep Kirkburn 16:46, 4 July 2006 (EDT) - (Vote swappage. Zomg, ambiguation!)

Comments

Just because nothing links to it doesn't mean it should be deleted. Was there a Second Burning Legion Invasion? Is there already a page for it, is it something someone can actually write information about? Ralthor 22:42, 4 Mar 2006 (EST)

I have now created the Third Burning Legion Invasion, the Fourth Burning Legion Invasion and the Fifth Burning Legion Invasion. Along the same logic, we can't delete those either because noone can present any information whatsoever on whether they happened or not... right?   I've also created an npc stub on The Long Lost Brother of Grom Stoutarm. Noone can delete it because you can't tell if he exists or not, since he's lost. Hah.   --Mikk 18:14, 19 June 2006 (EDT)
Look at the history - it's never had any info. Is it of any use? No. Was there a second burning legion invasion? Yes. Was it called that? No. Therefore, delete :) -- Kirkburn 16:54, 26 June 2006 (EDT)
Punk ;) I don't know much about the lore side of things. If there was an event called the "Second Burning Legion Invasion" it shouldn't be deleted, if there wasn't it should be deleted. You don't have to prove that one never existed, but I wasn't going vote until someone more knowledgable about lore either said yes or no to it (someone marked it as delete and I just created the vote page, but I wasn't sure why it was marked delete).--Ralthor 12:16, 3 July 2006 (EDT)
Ya know.. Wikipedia has a page with nutty conflicts. I think WoWWiki should have one too, and this one deserves to go on it :-P
I'm calling in the bookkeepers to straighten this matter up. --Mikk 21:01, 3 July 2006 (EDT)

Since the bookkeeper who usually deals with this is inactive, I'll clarify: the Second Burning Legion Invasion (often shortened simply to "Second Invasion") is latter half of the conflict usually called "The Third War"; essentially, the part of the Third War from Archimonde's summoning at Dalaran to his fall at Mount Hyjal. The term "Second Invasion" is often used in the lore, specifically when refering to demons or Night Elves, who fought in the First Invasion (War of the Ancients). As for what to do about this page, you could have it redirect to Third War or fill it in with information about the Invasion of Kalimdor and Eternity's End campaigns. --Ragestorm, Head Bookkeeper

Three cheers for Ragestorm! I've rewritten the page as a sort-of-disambiguation page, and am now changing my vote to keep. --Mikk 13:25, 4 July 2006 (EDT)
Omg, I filled out the WC III campaign pages with info from Wikipedia too. What's happening?! I'm filling out Lore pages! :-P --Mikk 13:45, 4 July 2006 (EDT)
lol my vote was a joke, but all hail the opinion of the lore god--Ralthor 14:52, 4 July 2006 (EDT)

Timeline

I don't think there's exact timeline of the exact start of the second invasion. Or? --Mordecay (talk) 14:10, 25 June 2016 (UTC)