Talk:Rouge

Deletion vote

Delete

1. Delete Salaskan 13:21, 11 August 2006 (EDT) - (What I said below.)

Keep

1. Keep Pzychotix 12:13, 9 August 2006 (EDT) - (It's only the most common misspelling. Har. Definitely related to WoW.)
2. Keep Fandyllic 5:07 PM PDT 9 Aug 2006 - (Something to remind people who misspell Rogue that their misspelling is actual another word.)
3. Keep Mikk 18:28, 9 August 2006 (EDT) - (This is a must :-))
4. Keep Rahskala 13:09, 10 August 2006 (EDT) - (I still think it's funny. :))
5. Keep Kirkburn 18:16, 11 August 2006 (EDT) - (Revoted, somehow my previous one got corrupted)

Comments

It seems clear to me why this should be deleted... No serious info, just methods how you can joke with people who speak bad English. --Salaskan 08:48, 9 August 2006

There's a bunch of less than serious articles on the wiki - this is a frequent but fun misspelling :) I like it! Perhaps the article could do with a little re-wording, however ... -- Kirkburn 11:53, 9 August 2006 (EDT)

Nothing like a ROUGE LFG PZL! to start the day. =D Pzychotix 12:01, 9 August 2006 (EDT)

Kirkburn: Actually, yeah.. I'll snip out the "poking fun at people" bit. It's a bit pointless. The rest is both accurate info and fun :-)   --Mikk 18:31, 9 August 2006 (EDT)

I love that mispelling aswell =D makes me laugh, but to create an article on the WoWWiki about how stupid it is and how you can make fun of people... Doesn't seem really informative to me. Well, if you want to keep it, whatever ^_^. Salaskan 13:20, 11 August 2006 (EDT)

Um, try reading the article again before you comment further? -- Kirkburn 18:13, 11 August 2006 (EDT)

---

Silly?

This article is not silly in my humble opinion. It is a misspelling, and labelled as such. It is one hundred percent factual and even educates the reader on what their typo actually means. It's just written in a fun-to-read way :-)   --Mikk (T) 11:41, 27 October 2006 (EDT)

My wikipedian gut reaction is to remove it, but WoWWiki isn't Wikipedia, and we have no encyclopedic tone guideline, so I think having funny articles is not a big deal. --Kinst 21:50, 4 November 2006 (EST)

I woudlnt call it funny...thats more derogatory...id call it a humorous article :) --Keya March 23, 2007

I re-added it, because it isn't a serious article. It's sarcastic and snarky, but not serious. Seems to be Silly to me. RogueJedi86 02:50, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

I thought it was "Rouges are overpowdered"...--Frosti 07:01, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Blizzard's own reference

Blizzard actually refer to this misspelling; on the Rogue page, if you mouse-over the headline image. Kudos to them. :)

(oh, and everytime I see someone with a name like "Darkrouge," I die a little bit inside -- especially because your name stays as it is) Veracon 17:49, 10 August 2007 (UTC)