Talk:One in the Deeps
Deletion vote
- Voting no longer necessary, page is now being redirected.
Votes
- Delete
- Keep
Comments
- Sounds like something pulled of their @ss, unless some source is given. -- Fandyllic (talk · contr) 9:16 PM PST 8 Sep 2008
The one in the deeps is actually from Dark Factions, though the info needs some reworking. I'll get on that.Tweak the Whacked (talk) 04:22, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
- Yup, I just checked, page 10-11 in dark factions.. thankyou for knowing this. {T •C ) 04:28, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
You know what? I'm with you guys. I can't say I pulled it out of my ass, but I can't say I did a good job researching it. How do I vote up for deletioon? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Xxwafflesaa (talk · contr).
- Not now =P, now that it has a source. It can be improved upon.... though it could just be merged with the murloc page... Tweak said he'll work on the page, so lets see what he does {T •C ) 04:36, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
Ahhhhhh Ic. Good luck Tweak! Hope you know more then I do! Lol. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Xxwafflesaa (talk · contr).
Actually, upon taking another look at the info presented, I'm going to say that we leave it in the faith section of the murloc page, if it has that section. If not, I'll add it. May just be that I'm too tired to word the page right, though, so if someone else would like to take a crack at it, feel free.Tweak the Whacked (talk) 04:49, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
You do have a point there amigo. Actually, once I think about it, I should have just put it there a long time ago.But, like tweek said, I'm too tired. I might take a crack at it in the morning. Until then! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Xxwafflesaa (talk · contr).