Talk:Lightwell

Still a joke talent?

The introduction to this page was written before the talent was buffed. Has the buff changed the talent's reputation? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Boukephalos7492 (talk · contr).

It's still a joke...too long of a CD, breaks on damage(this is mostly useful for AoE damage thus negating the charges...5 renews would be better) and just...sucks... Acecow 02:05, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Another problem is that it doesn't do much if the people who need healing have no idea it's been used Gigawolf1 (talk) 02:38, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

It can also be very handy in AB or WSG when defending, if only to heal defenders between assaults. The key thing is for people to know what it is, how to use it (ie only when you *need* healing, as many people seem to click it for no real reason) and that it's there. Many priests apparently use macros to automatically inform the group of this each time one is cast. It can be worth casting even if only the priest himself uses it, due to its incredible HPM, and in 1 vs 1 encounters, provided the priest stays close to the Lightwell (often best cast near flag in AB) can allow the priest to survive and heal from a ludicrous amount of damage, not least of all (as Lost-Blue says below) because it can be used while stunned and sapped. *Potentially* a phenomenal ability. The problem lies in achieving that potential! -- Taohinton (talk) 22:21, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

You do realize you can use this while stunned, feared, or sapped.... right? its excelent in pvp and for pve its can be good when you know your going to camp. Lost-Blue 04:11, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

Lightwell Renew Change

I don't recall when the specific change to this effect was implemented, all I know is it happened after 3.0--Saphiredragon89 (talk) 01:44, July 19, 2010 (UTC)