Talk:Amphibious
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
I think we should move this to "Amphibious" due to "Amphibians" having vertebrates, laying eggs in water, and not being able to breath in water when they are adults. Rolandius (talk - contr) 02:49, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
- "For some reason, this list contains both literal amphibians and creatures that can move both on land and in water in-game." That is what amphibious means. If we had just amphibians, the list would be really short indeed. Also, like I said in one of my edits, the term amphibious is used a lot while amphibian is not used much. Rolandius (talk - contr) 03:52, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- That is okay. I was trying to sort it out myself earlier because the original title of the article was "Amphibian" but then the article had a definition that related to Amphibious creatures. It then said "Examples of amphibious creatures". So if everything was about Amphibious terms, I thought the article should just be changed to Amphibious also. I then looked in the RPG and they used Amphibious a lot also. If we used the term Amphibian, we wouldn't be able to include some entries like Murloc, Makrura, etc. because it looks like Amphibians are only things like frogs, toads, etc. Rolandius (talk - contr) 04:44, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- Well i would say merge it with aquatic...--Ashbear160 (talk) 00:54, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
- Surely the fact that amphibious creatures are viable on both land and in/under water should be reason to keep it seperate from aquatic creatures which are limited to water/liquid, if there are incorrct items the lists should be cleaned up not merged as this would create more incorrect definitions on the list Deludo (T •C ) 13:32, 26 November 2011 (UTC)