Forum:Would this be worth making?
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Forums: Village pump → Would this be worth making?
(This topic is archived. Please do not edit this page!)
(This topic is archived. Please do not edit this page!)
Alright. I thought of an idea for an article but wanted to know how the WoWPedia community felt about it before I did. I wanted to create some articles about how to do some things in roleplaying, not for sure what to call them. For example: How to roleplay a thief.
How do you guys feel about it?Theundeadsteak (talk) 18:51, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
- We have a page like that for each of the playable races. We had more than that at some point, like vampires, but I can not find them currently, with the exception of How to roleplay a powerful character well. That may be representative of the consensus on Wowpedia, but you can try to start such pages up again if you really want to.--SWM2448 18:59, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
- I would say that most of the playable race roleplaying guides do need a bit of tidying up. 19:09, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
- Be bold. Go ahead and start the articles, just be prepared for other people to change them and encourage all parties to defend their edits on the talk page if there is controversy. Also, make sure to add them to Category:Roleplaying by putting
[[Category:Roleplaying]]
at the end of the page. -- Fandyllic (talk · contribs) 3:16 PM PST 4 Dec 2010
- Be bold. Go ahead and start the articles, just be prepared for other people to change them and encourage all parties to defend their edits on the talk page if there is controversy. Also, make sure to add them to Category:Roleplaying by putting
- I'm not afraid of people editing it, I love that people edit it to make it better. I'm just wondering if it would really be an article worth creating on WoWPedia.Theundeadsteak (talk) 03:24, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
- Theundeadsteak, please feel free to add links to the new roleplaying pages below so we can follow their progress and perhaps add or edit.
- Also, here's a few tips after looking at your start:
- Don't put capitals in the middle of a new page name unless it really needs to be there (I renamed "How to Roleplay a thief" to "How to roleplay a thief") as per Project:Naming policy.
- It's always good practice to put a stub like
{{Stub/Other}}
at the top of your new article. - You should probably explain that your guide is from a particular perspective (it appears to be geared toward the pen-and-paper RPG rather than WoW in-game roleplaying).
- When you link to pages on Wowpedia, you don't have to make them like
[http://wowpedia.org/pagename linklabel]
, you can use local wiki links like[[pagename | linklabel]]
. - And don't forget to add
[[Category:Roleplaying]]
at the end.
- -- Fandyllic (talk · contribs) 11:46 PM PST 4 Dec 2010
- Also, here's a few tips after looking at your start:
Keeping track
- How to roleplay a thief
Working on it
- Alright, thanks. Still new to creating articles, so I am still trying to learn. I tried the suggestion on links before you showed to to me but it didn't work so I did it like that. Again, thanks for the advice and edits. =) Theundeadsteak (talk) 20:10, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
- Everyone was a newbie once. At least here you don't have to worry about a "wiki score". I'll check in on your articles from time to time, try looking at edits other people make, that's how I learned alot.
- What links didn't work for you? Did you know about create page for making new pages? The more we know about specific problems new users have, we can try to fix them. -- Fandyllic (talk · contribs) 1:25 PM PST 5 Dec 2010
- The one to remove the arrow by the word that's linking to another article. I did the exact command and it showed the link and outside brackets.Theundeadsteak (talk) 18:38, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
Code | Output | Notes |
---|---|---|
http://www.wowpedia.org/Alchemy_recipes | http://www.wowpedia.org/Alchemy_recipies | Avoid using this. |
[[Alchemy recipes]] | Alchemy recipes | Use this for internal links |
[[Alchemy recipes|Alchemy is cool]] | Alchemy is cool | Use this for internal links too! |
[http://www.google.com] | [1] | Use this for external links, but not preferred |
[http://www.google.com Search for it on Google!] | Search for it on Google! | Use this for external links too! |
Hope this helps you! -- D.D. Corkum (T / C) 23:56, 6 December 2010 (UTC) |
Doing the simple [http://www.google.com] type of link is not preferred. Only use it if you don't have time to make it better. -- Fandyllic (talk · contribs) 5:01 PM PST 6 Dec 2010
- Ok, thanks big time!Theundeadsteak (talk) 14:07, 7 December 2010 (UTC)