Category talk:Enhancers

Deletion vote

Votes

Delete

1. Delete Howbizr (talk) 19:16, 30 December 2008 (UTC) - (Nominated)

Keep

1. Keep Eirik Ratcatcher (talk) 17:05, 31 March 2009 (UTC) - (see comments)
2. Keep g0urra[T҂C] 09:47, 1 April 2009 (UTC) - (no comment)
3. Keep Sssssssssssssssssssssssss For Pony! (^Sssss/_Slithered) 23:40, 1 April 2009 (UTC) - (Has a main article, Enhancer, might as well keep.)
4. Keep  Howbizr^(t·c) 12:50 PM, 19 Jul 2009 (EDT) - (Really don't remember what I was thinking when I nominated this. Probably just that "enhancers" is a really awkward name. We should probably keep it.)

Comments

I think this is just a game term. There are plenty of other categories to cover whatever might be listed here in this "catch-all" - Category:Oils, Category:Augments, Category:Enchantments, etc. -Howbizr (talk) 19:16, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

This category is useful to 'catch-all' of the (sub-)categories of "things that improve an item". For me, then, a "no" vote. --Eirik Ratcatcher (talk) 17:05, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Maybe we should close the vote, since I'm changing my stance on it.  Howbizr^(t·c) 12:50 PM, 19 Jul 2009 (EDT)

---