Category talk:Argent Dawn

It seems that this article should be moved to category:Faction:Argent Dawn, or rather to Argent Dawn, and all articles that link to this category (category:Argent Dawn) and category:The Argent Dawn should be linked to the first category mentioned instead. I'm not sure I want to do anything like this without a concensus. If it was up to me, though, I would change all the articles that link to this one to the first category mentioned, but I'd change the information in the "article" portion of this to Argent Dawn. Can someone let me know if they agree? See also special:categories to see what categories things link to. -Schmidt (talk) Sept 30, 2005 (20:58 EDT)

I'd really hate to see yet another prefix applied to articles that don't need a prefix in the first place.

Case in point: this is an article about "The Argent Dawn", and there's no reason on god's green earth that this needs to be a category. Look at the articles that are actually in this category: 3 of the four are just spelling variations of "Argent Dawn". In fact, I don't know why I'm typing this instead of just moving this to the article "Agent Dawn".

Once an article, you just apply the "Faction" category to associate it with other Faction articles.

- Laisren; Sept. 30, 2005 (21:20 EDT)

I do agree with you, I think. What I mean is, the article element of this should be at Argent Dawn. This we agree upon, I believe, and I feel strongly about too. Further, all the articles that link to this category, category:Argent Dawn should be instead be linked to category:Faction:Argent Dawn. Perhaps we don't agree upon this. I don't really care, on this second point. Schmidt talk 21:33, 30 Sep 2005 (EDT)